Back to Search Start Over

How to choose and become a reviewer for a scientific medical journal

Authors :
Paola Gnerre
Paola Granata
Andrea Fontanella
Dario Manfellotto
Cecilia Politi
Roberto Nardi
Giorgio Vescovo
Source :
Italian Journal of Medicine, Vol 12, Iss 2, Pp 151-158 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
PAGEPress Publications, 2018.

Abstract

Peer review is the process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field. The peer review of scientific manuscripts is a cornerstone of modern science and medicine. Some journals have difficulty in finding appropriate reviewers who are able to complete reviews on time avoiding publication delay. We discuss some of the main issues involved during the peer review process. The reviewer has a direct and important impact on the quality of a scientific medical Journal. Editors select reviewers on the basis of their expertise. Reviewers are more likely to accept to review a manuscript when it is relevant to their area of interest. They should respond to ethical principles, excluding any conflict of interest condition. The reviewer has to be professional, constructive, tactful, empathetic and respectful. Structured approaches, quality indicators and step-by-step process check list formats could be useful in obtaining a good review.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18779352 and 18779344
Volume :
12
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Italian Journal of Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c49b5eeee4f6df662d2047080d8c756a