Back to Search Start Over

Normal values and regional differences in oesophageal impedance-pH metrics: a consensus analysis of impedance-pH studies from around the world

Authors :
Yeong Yeh Lee
Miguel A. Valdovinos
Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Radu Tutuian
Nicola de Bortoli
Sutep Gonlachanvit
Alastair M Sammon
Julio Perez de la Serna
José María Remes-Troche
Michele Cicala
C. Prakash Gyawali
Tanisa Patcharatraku
Anne Lund Krarup
Marzio Frazzoni
Donald O. Castell
Serhat Bor
Chai Soon Ngiu
Magnus Simren
Yinglian Xiao
Osamu Kawamura
Mentore Ribolsi
Daniel Sifrim
Edoardo Savarino
Sabine Roman
E. J. Ndebia
Rosa I. Ramos
Albert J. Bredenoord
Frank Zerbib
Ans Pauwels
Jan Tack
Ege Üniversitesi
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
Source :
Sifrim, D, Roman, S, Savarino, E, Bor, S, Bredenoord, A J, Castell, D, Cicala, M, de Bortoli, N, Frazzoni, M, Gonlachanvit, S, Iwakiri, K, Kawamura, O, Krarup, A, Lee, Y Y, Soon Ngiu, C, Ndebia, E, Patcharatraku, T, Pauwels, A, Pérez de la Serna, J, Ramos, R, Remes-Troche, J M, Ribolsi, M, Sammon, A, Simren, M, Tack, J, Tutuian, R, Valdovinos, M, Xiao, Y, Zerbib, F & Gyawali, C P 2021, ' Normal values and regional differences in oesophageal impedance-pH metrics : a consensus analysis of impedance-pH studies from around the world ', Gut, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1441–1449 . https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322627, Gut, 70(8), 1441-1449. BMJ Publishing Group
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective Limitations of existing impedance-pH thresholds include small sample size of normative studies, inclusion of artefactual pH drops and incorrect identification of impedance reflux events. We aimed to obtain new impedance-pH thresholds from expert consensus analysis of tracings from a large number of healthy subjects. Design Of 541 studies performed worldwide using two different systems (Diversatek, USA, and Laborie, Netherlands), 150 tracings with oesophageal diagnoses, behavioural disorders and study-related artefacts were excluded. The remainder studies were subject to two reviewer consensus analysis, in-person or through video conference, consisting of editing meals and pH drops, identification of impedance reflux and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) using strict pre-established criteria and measurement of distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI). Results Consensus analysis was performed in 391 tracings (age 32.7 years, range 18-71, 54.2% female). Normative thresholds were significantly different between Diversatek and Laborie (total acid exposure time: 2.8% and 5%; reflux episodes: 55 and 78; MNBI at 3 cm: 1400 and 1500 ohms, at 5 cm: 1400 and 1800 ohms). Males had higher acid exposure, more reflux episodes and lower MNBI. Significant regional differences were identified, including higher PSPW scores in Western countries, and higher MNBI in Asia using Diversatek, and higher acid exposure in the Netherlands, higher MNBI in Asia and South Africa, and lower MNBI in Turkey using Laborie. Conclusion Normal impedance-pH monitoring thresholds have regional and system-related differences. Clinical interpretation needs to use normal thresholds valid for the system used and world region, following careful editing of the tracings.<br />Queen Mary University of London, UK [DDCH1A3R]<br />The study was conducted with financial support from Research Grant DDCH1A3R, Queen Mary University of London, UK.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00175749
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Sifrim, D, Roman, S, Savarino, E, Bor, S, Bredenoord, A J, Castell, D, Cicala, M, de Bortoli, N, Frazzoni, M, Gonlachanvit, S, Iwakiri, K, Kawamura, O, Krarup, A, Lee, Y Y, Soon Ngiu, C, Ndebia, E, Patcharatraku, T, Pauwels, A, Pérez de la Serna, J, Ramos, R, Remes-Troche, J M, Ribolsi, M, Sammon, A, Simren, M, Tack, J, Tutuian, R, Valdovinos, M, Xiao, Y, Zerbib, F & Gyawali, C P 2021, ' Normal values and regional differences in oesophageal impedance-pH metrics : a consensus analysis of impedance-pH studies from around the world ', Gut, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1441–1449 . https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322627, Gut, 70(8), 1441-1449. BMJ Publishing Group
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c50580ec28af634807e863ac0a891a33