Back to Search Start Over

Duration of Untreated Cardiac Arrest and Clinical Relevance of Animal Experiments: The Relationship Between the 'No-Flow' Duration and the Severity of Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome in a Porcine Model

Authors :
Luigi Grassi
Anita Luciani
D. De Zani
Mario Luini
Eugenio Scanziani
Teresa Letizia
Francesca Fumagalli
A. Boccardo
Davide Pravettoni
Fabio Fiordaliso
Giuseppe Ristagno
Gioanni Babini
Marcella De Maglie
Monica Salio
Ilaria Russo
Lidia Staszewsky
Serge Masson
Roberto Latini
Deborah Novelli
Source :
Shock. 49:205-212
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The study investigated the effect of untreated cardiac arrest (CA), that is, "no-flow" time, on postresuscitation myocardial and neurological injury, and survival in a pig model to identify an optimal duration that adequately reflects the most frequent clinical scenario. METHODS An established model of myocardial infarction followed by CA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was used. Twenty-two pigs were subjected to three no-flow durations: short (8-10 min), intermediate (12-13 min), and long (14-15 min). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed together with thermodilution cardiac output (CO) and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). Neurological impairment was evaluated by neurological scores, serum neuron specific enolase (NSE), and histopathology. RESULTS More than 60% of animals survived when the duration of CA was ≤13 min, compared to only 20% for a duration ≥14 min. Neuronal degeneration and neurological scores showed a trend toward a worse recovery for longer no-flow durations. No animals achieved a good neurological recovery for a no-flow ≥14 min, in comparison to a 56% for a duration ≤13 min (P = 0.043). Serum NSE levels significantly correlated with the no-flow duration (r = 0.892). Longer durations of CA were characterized by lower LVEF and CO compared to shorter durations (P

Details

ISSN :
15400514 and 10732322
Volume :
49
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Shock
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c56fd6829beb93879202ada7487e375c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0000000000000914