Back to Search Start Over

Leaf water potential measurements using the pressure chamber: Synthetic testing of assumptions towards best practices for precision and accuracy

Authors :
Celia M. Rodriguez‐Dominguez
Alicia Forner
Sebastia Martorell
Brendan Choat
Rosana Lopez
Jennifer M. R. Peters
Sebastian Pfautsch
Stefan Mayr
Madeline R. Carins‐Murphy
Scott A. M. McAdam
Freya Richardson
Antonio Diaz‐Espejo
Virginia Hernandez‐Santana
Paulo E. Menezes‐Silva
Jose M. Torres‐Ruiz
Timothy A. Batz
Lawren Sack
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (IRNAS)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC)
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Departamento de Biogeografía y Cambio Global, Laboratorio Internacional de Cambio Global (LINC-Global)
Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)
Université des îles Baléares (UIB)
Western Sydney University
Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment [Richmond] (HIE)
Institute of Botany [Innsbruck]
Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck - University of Innsbruck
School of Biological Sciences [Hobart]
University of Tasmania [Hobart, Australia] (UTAS)
Purdue University [West Lafayette]
Laboratoire de Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l’Arbre en environnement Fluctuant (PIAF)
Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)
Perdue University
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (Faculty of Biology)
University of Science-Vietnam National Universities
SKA South Africa751918-AgroPHYSAustrian Science Fund (FWF)P32203National Science Foundation (NSF)1457279
European Project: 624473,EC:FP7:PEOPLE,FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IOF,HYDROPIT(2015)
European Commission
Austrian Research Promotion Agency
National Science Foundation (US)
Rodríguez Domínguez, Celia M.
Forner, Alicia
Choat, B.
López, Rosana
Peters, J.M.R.
Pfautsch, S.
Carins Murphy, Madeline R.
McAdam S.A.M.
Richardson, Freya
Díaz-Espejo, Antonio
Hernández Santana, V.
Menezes-Silva, Paulo E.
Torres Ruiz, José Manuel
Sack, Lawren
Rodríguez Domínguez, Celia M. [0000-0003-2352-0829]
Forner, Alicia [0000-0002-7123-6403]
Choat, B.[0000-0002-9105-640X]
López, Rosana [0000-0003-3553-9148]
Peters, J.M.R. [0000-0003-4627-7788]
Pfautsch, S. [0000-0002-4390-4195]
Carins Murphy, Madeline R. [0000-0003-4370-9485]
McAdam S.A.M. [0000-0002-9625-6750]
Richardson, Freya [0000-0003-2460-3423]
Díaz-Espejo, Antonio [0000-0002-4711-2494]
Hernández Santana, V. [0000-0001-9018-8622]
Menezes-Silva, Paulo E. [0000-0002-8122-3489]
Torres Ruiz, José Manuel [0000-0003-1367-7056]
Sack, Lawren [0000-0002-7009-7202]
Source :
Plant, Cell and Environment, Plant, Cell and Environment, 2022, 25 p. ⟨10.1111/pce.14330⟩, Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

25 páginas.- 8 figuras.- 2 tablas.- 66 referencias.- Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article.<br />eaf water potential (psi(leaf)), typically measured using the pressure chamber, is the most important metric of plant water status, providing high theoretical value and information content for multiple applications in quantifying critical physiological processes including drought responses. Pressure chamber measurements of psi(leaf) (psi(leafPC)) are most typical, yet, the practical complexity of the technique and of the underlying theory has led to ambiguous understanding of the conditions to optimize measurements. Consequently, specific techniques and precautions diversified across the global research community, raising questions of reliability and repeatability. Here, we surveyed specific methods of psi(leafPC) from multiple laboratories, and synthesized experiments testing common assumptions and practices in psi(leafPC) for diverse species: (i) the need for equilibration of previously transpiring leaves; (ii) leaf storage before measurement; (iii) the equilibration of psi(leaf) for leaves on bagged branches of a range of dehydration; (iv) the equilibration of psi(leaf) across the lamina for bagged leaves, and the accuracy of measuring leaves with artificially 'elongated petioles'; (v) the need in psi(leaf) measurements for bagging leaves and high humidity within the chamber; (vi) the need to avoid liquid water on leaf surfaces; (vii) the use of 'pulse' pressurization versus gradual pressurization; and (viii) variation among experimenters in psi(leafPC) determination. Based on our findings we provide a best practice protocol to maximise accuracy, and provide recommendations for ongoing species-specific tests of important assumptions in future studies.<br />European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 751918-AgroPHYS; Marie Curie Fellowship (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IOF-624473); Austrian research agency (FWF) project P32203; National Science Foundation (Grant IOS-#1457279)

Details

ISSN :
13653040 and 01407791
Volume :
45
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Plant, Cell & Environment
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c58145b334462d6fa6778d25ab2a1bd4