Back to Search Start Over

Multi-site repeatability and reproducibility of MR fingerprinting of the healthy brain at 1.5 and 3.0 T

Authors :
Fulvio Zaccagna
Paolo Cecchi
Rolf F. Schulte
Frank Riemer
Martin J. Graves
Laura Biagi
Michela Tosetti
Joshua D. Kaggie
Mary A. McLean
Ferdia A. Gallagher
Mirco Cosottini
Alessandra Retico
Pedro A. Gómez
Guido Buonincontri
Buonincontri G.
Biagi L.
Retico A.
Cecchi P.
Cosottini M.
Gallagher F.A.
Gomez P.A.
Graves M.J.
McLean M.A.
Riemer F.
Schulte R.F.
Tosetti M.
Zaccagna F.
Kaggie J.D.
Gallagher, Ferdia [0000-0003-4784-5230]
Graves, Martin [0000-0003-4327-3052]
McLean, Mary [0000-0002-3752-0179]
Riemer, Frank [0000-0002-3805-5221]
Zaccagna, Fulvio [0000-0001-6838-9532]
Kaggie, Joshua [0000-0001-6706-3442]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Source :
NeuroImage
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Fully-quantitative MR imaging methods are useful for longitudinal characterization of disease and assessment of treatment efficacy. However, current quantitative MRI protocols have not been widely adopted in the clinic, mostly due to lengthy scan times. Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) is a new technique that can reconstruct multiple parametric maps from a single fast acquisition in the transient state of the MR signal. Due to the relative novelty of this technique, the repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative measurements obtained using MRF has not been extensively studied. Our study acquired test/retest data from the brains of nine healthy volunteers, each scanned on five MRI systems (two at 3.0 T and three at 1.5 T, all from a single vendor) located at two different centers. The pulse sequence and reconstruction algorithm were the same for all acquisitions. After registration of the MRF-derived M0, T1 and T2 maps to an anatomical atlas, coefficients-of-variation (CVs) were computed to assess test/retest repeatability and inter-site reproducibility in each voxel, while a General Linear Model (GLM) was used to determine the voxel-wise variability between all confounders, which included test/retest, subject, field strength and site. Our analysis demonstrated an excellent repeatability (CVs of 2–3% for T1, 5–8% for T2, 3% for normalized-M0) and a good reproducibility (CVs of 3–8% for T1, 8–14% for T2, 5% for normalized-M0) in grey and white matter.

Details

ISSN :
10538119
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
NeuroImage
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c59f1b2f519d46e7b3acaacc5c367988
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.047