Back to Search Start Over

Data from Analysis of 1,115 Patients Tested for MET Amplification and Therapy Response in the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic

Authors :
David S. Hong
Funda Meric-Bernstam
Razelle Kurzrock
Ravi Salgia
Raja Luthra
Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
Marylin M. Li
Vijaykumar Holla
Apostolia M. Tsimberidou
Aung Naing
Ralph G. Zinner
Jennifer J. Wheler
Siqing Fu
Filip Janku
Kenneth Hess
Gerald S. Falchook
Debora De Melo Gagliato
Chad Tang
Denis L.F. Jardim
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2023.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications.Experimental Design: From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status.Results: Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P = 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12; 95% confidence intervals, 0.83–1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%). No patient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response.Conclusion:MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6336–45. ©2014 AACR.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c5bde600b9f595ddb35005078b723039