Back to Search Start Over

Validation and Reproducibility of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as Assessed With Velocity-Encoded MRI

Authors :
Jaap Ottenkamp
Jeroen J. Bax
Albert de Roos
Rob J. van der Geest
Heynric B. Grotenhuis
Jos J.M. Westenberg
J. Wouter Jukema
Paul Steendijk
Pediatric surgery
ICaR - Ischemia and repair
ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences
Paediatric Cardiology
Source :
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(3), 521-526. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Grotenhuis, H B, Westenberg, J M, Steendijk, P, van der Geest, R J, Ottenkamp, J, Bax, J J, Jukema, J W & de Roos, A 2009, ' Validation and Reproducibility of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as Assessed With Velocity-Encoded MRI ', Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 521-526 . https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21886, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 30(3), 521-526. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

PURPOSE To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV(MRI)) with PWV determined from invasive intra-aortic pressure measurements (PWV(INV)) and to test the reproducibility of the measurement by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS PWV(MRI) was compared with PWV(INV) in 18 nonconsecutive patients scheduled for catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease. Reproducibility of PWV(MRI) was tested in 10 healthy volunteers who underwent repeated measurement of PWV(MRI) at a single occasion. Velocity-encoded MRI was performed on all participants to assess PWV(MRI) in the total aorta (Ao(total)), the proximal aorta (Ao(prox)), and the distal aorta (Ao(dist)). RESULTS The results are expressed as mean +/- SD, Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and intraclass correlation (ICC). Good agreement between PWV(MRI) and PWV(INV) was found for Ao(total) (6.5 +/- 1.1 m/s vs. 6.1 +/- 0.8 m/s; PCC = 0.53), Ao(prox) (6.5 +/- 1.3 m/s vs. 6.2 +/- 1.1 m/s; PCC = 0.69), and for Ao(dist) (6.9 +/- 1.1 m/s vs. 6.1 +/- 1.0 m/s; PCC = 0.71). Reproducibility of PWV(MRI) was high for Ao(total) (4.3 +/- 0.5 m/s vs. 4.6 +/- 0.7 m/s; ICC = 0.90, P < 0.01), Ao(prox) (4.3 +/- 0.9 m/s vs. 4.7 +/- 1.0 m/s; ICC = 0.87, P < 0.01), and Ao(dist) (4.3 +/- 0.6 m/s vs. 4.4 +/- 0.8 m/s; ICC = 0.92, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION MRI assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity shows good agreement with invasive pressure measurements and can be determined with high reproducibility.

Details

ISSN :
10531807
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(3), 521-526. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Grotenhuis, H B, Westenberg, J M, Steendijk, P, van der Geest, R J, Ottenkamp, J, Bax, J J, Jukema, J W & de Roos, A 2009, ' Validation and Reproducibility of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as Assessed With Velocity-Encoded MRI ', Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 521-526 . https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21886, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 30(3), 521-526. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c5c4349a5e880a6d6acc0feffe18759e