Back to Search
Start Over
Validation and Reproducibility of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as Assessed With Velocity-Encoded MRI
- Source :
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(3), 521-526. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Grotenhuis, H B, Westenberg, J M, Steendijk, P, van der Geest, R J, Ottenkamp, J, Bax, J J, Jukema, J W & de Roos, A 2009, ' Validation and Reproducibility of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as Assessed With Velocity-Encoded MRI ', Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 521-526 . https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21886, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 30(3), 521-526. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
- Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- PURPOSE To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV(MRI)) with PWV determined from invasive intra-aortic pressure measurements (PWV(INV)) and to test the reproducibility of the measurement by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS PWV(MRI) was compared with PWV(INV) in 18 nonconsecutive patients scheduled for catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease. Reproducibility of PWV(MRI) was tested in 10 healthy volunteers who underwent repeated measurement of PWV(MRI) at a single occasion. Velocity-encoded MRI was performed on all participants to assess PWV(MRI) in the total aorta (Ao(total)), the proximal aorta (Ao(prox)), and the distal aorta (Ao(dist)). RESULTS The results are expressed as mean +/- SD, Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and intraclass correlation (ICC). Good agreement between PWV(MRI) and PWV(INV) was found for Ao(total) (6.5 +/- 1.1 m/s vs. 6.1 +/- 0.8 m/s; PCC = 0.53), Ao(prox) (6.5 +/- 1.3 m/s vs. 6.2 +/- 1.1 m/s; PCC = 0.69), and for Ao(dist) (6.9 +/- 1.1 m/s vs. 6.1 +/- 1.0 m/s; PCC = 0.71). Reproducibility of PWV(MRI) was high for Ao(total) (4.3 +/- 0.5 m/s vs. 4.6 +/- 0.7 m/s; ICC = 0.90, P < 0.01), Ao(prox) (4.3 +/- 0.9 m/s vs. 4.7 +/- 1.0 m/s; ICC = 0.87, P < 0.01), and Ao(dist) (4.3 +/- 0.6 m/s vs. 4.4 +/- 0.8 m/s; ICC = 0.92, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION MRI assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity shows good agreement with invasive pressure measurements and can be determined with high reproducibility.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Intraclass correlation
Coronary Artery Disease
medicine.artery
Healthy volunteers
medicine
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
cardiovascular diseases
Pulse wave velocity
Aorta
Reproducibility
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Reproducibility of Results
Magnetic resonance imaging
Blood Pressure Determination
Middle Aged
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pulsatile Flow
cardiovascular system
Female
Radiology
Nuclear medicine
business
Blood Flow Velocity
circulatory and respiratory physiology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10531807
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(3), 521-526. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Grotenhuis, H B, Westenberg, J M, Steendijk, P, van der Geest, R J, Ottenkamp, J, Bax, J J, Jukema, J W & de Roos, A 2009, ' Validation and Reproducibility of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as Assessed With Velocity-Encoded MRI ', Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 521-526 . https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21886, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 30(3), 521-526. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c5c4349a5e880a6d6acc0feffe18759e