Back to Search Start Over

Inventory of oncologists' unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

Authors :
Miriam Koopman
Ellen G. Engelhardt
Dóra Révész
Cornelis J. A. Punt
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Hans J. Tamminga
Veerle M.H. Coupé
Henrica C. W. de Vet
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Oncology
CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life
Public Health
Epidemiology and Data Science
APH - Quality of Care
VU University medical center
Public and occupational health
APH - Aging & Later Life
CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life
APH - Mental Health
AGEM - Re-generation and cancer of the digestive system
APH - Methodology
Source :
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18(1), 132. BioMed Central, BMC medical informatics and decision making, 18(1):132. BioMed Central, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018), BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18:132. BioMed Central Ltd., BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18(1):132. BioMed Central, Engelhardt, E G, Révész, D R, Tamminga, H J, Punt, C J A, Koopman, M, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B D, Steyerberg, E W, de Vet, H C W & Coupé, V M H 2018, ' Inventory of oncologists' unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer ', BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 18, no. 1, 132 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0712-9, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0712-9
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background Decision-making about palliative care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) consists of many different treatment-related decisions, and there generally is no best treatment option. Decision support systems (DSS), e.g., prognostic calculators, can aid oncologists’ decision-making. DSS that contain features tailored to the needs of oncologists are more likely to be implemented in clinical practice. Therefore, our aim is to inventory colorectal cancer specialists’ unmet decision support needs. Methods We asked oncologists from the Dutch colorectal cancer group (DCCG), to participate in an online inventory questionnaire on their unmet decision support needs. To get more in-depth insight in required features of the DSS they need, we also conducted semi-structured telephone interviews. Results Forty-one oncologists started the inventory questionnaire, and 27 of them completed all items. Of all respondents, 18 were surgeons (44%), 22 were medical oncologists (54%), and 28 (68%) had more than 10 years of experience treating mCRC. In both the inventory questionnaire and interviews, respondents expressed a need for an overarching DSS incorporating multiple treatment options, and presenting both the treatment benefits and harms. Respondents found it relevant for other outcomes, such as cost-effectiveness of treatment or quality of life, to be incorporated in DSS. There was also a wish for DSS incorporating an up-to-date “personalized” overview of the ongoing trials for which a specific patient is eligible. Conclusions Experienced oncologists indicate that their treatment advice is currently almost solely based on the available clinical guidelines. They experience a lack of good quality DSS to help them personalize their treatment advice. New tools integrating multiple treatment options and providing a broad range of clinically relevant outcomes are urgently needed to stimulate and safeguard more personalized treatment decision-making.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726947
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c608a737fc50ecc0055e0d7587106a1e