Back to Search
Start Over
Scientific Review Committees as part of institutional review of human participant research: Initial implementation at institutions with Clinical and Translational Science Awards
- Source :
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2020.
-
Abstract
- Introduction:Scientific quality and feasibility are part of ethics review by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Scientific Review Committees (SRCs) were proposed to facilitate this assessment by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) SRC Consensus Group. This study assessed SRC feasibility and impact at CTSA-affiliated academic health centers (AHCs).Methods:SRC implementation at 10 AHCs was assessed pre/post-intervention using quantitative and qualitative methods. Pre-intervention, four AHCs had no SRC, and six had at least one SRC needing modifications to better align with Consensus Group recommendations.Results:Facilitators of successful SRC implementation included broad-based communication, an external motivator, senior-level support, and committed SRC reviewers. Barriers included limited resources and staffing, variable local mandates, limited SRC authority, lack of anticipated benefit, and operational challenges. Research protocol quality did not differ significantly between study periods, but respondents suggested positive effects. During intervention, median total review duration did not lengthen for the 40% of protocols approved within 3 weeks. For the 60% under review after 3 weeks, review was lengthened primarily due to longer IRB review for SRC-reviewed protocols. Site interviews recommended designing locally effective SRC processes, building buy-in by communication or by mandate, allowing time for planning and sharing best practices, and connecting SRC and IRB procedures.Conclusions:The CTSA SRC Consensus Group recommendations appear feasible. Although not conclusive in this relatively short initial implementation, sites perceived positive impact by SRCs on study quality. Optimal benefit will require local or federal mandate for implementation, adapting processes to local contexts, and employing SRC stipulations.
- Subjects :
- Protocol (science)
Medical education
030505 public health
Ethics review
Best practice
Staffing
Research Methods and Technology
Review Committees
General Medicine
operational feasibility
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Scientific Review Committee
quantitative and qualitative methods
Clinical and Translational Science Award
Mandate
030212 general & internal medicine
Translational science
scientific quality
0305 other medical science
Psychology
Research Article
Qualitative research
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 20598661
- Volume :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c609c55f68e606edfcec76b25ae60f5c