Back to Search Start Over

Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing

Authors :
Ginocchio, C. C.
Garcia-Mondragon, C.
Mauerhofer, B.
Rindlisbacher, C.
Forcelledo, L.
Fernandez, J.
Lienhard, R.
Kerschner, H.
Rossolini, G. M.
Armand-Lefevre, L.
D'Humieres, C.
Cambau, E.
Benmansour, H.
Cavallo, R.
Altwegg, M.
Berlinger, L.
Bonnet, R.
Saint-Sardos, P.
Meex, C.
Lavigne, J. P.
Leveque, N.
Broutin, L.
Cattoir, V.
Auger, G.
Pereira, H.
Paitan, Y.
Verroken, A.
Pailhories, H.
Lemarie, C.
Martinetti-Lucchini, G.
Frigerio Malossa, S.
Sanguinetti, M.
Spanu, T.
Vandenesch, F.
Poyart, C.
Loubinoux, J.
Mira, J. P.
Bonacorsi, S.
Cointe, A.
Munoz, P.
Kestler, M.
Esteva, C.
Queralt, X.
Garcia-Rodriguez, J.
Gomez, M. D.
Lopez-Hontangas, J. L.
Ghisetti, V.
Burdino, E.
Schubert, S.
Mencacci, A.
Allegrucci, F.
Rozemeijer, W.
Paternotte, N.
Allard, A.
M. C., Re
Ambretti, S.
Skov, M.
Agergaard, C. N.
Subudhi, P.
Wichelhaus, T. A.
Egli, A.
Hinic, V.
Alcock, A.
Banavathi, K.
Tiberio, C.
Ruocco, G.
Atripaldi, L.
Source :
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, and the EME Evaluation Program Collaborative, Skov, M N & Agergaard, C N 2021, ' Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing ', European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1609–1622 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04195-5
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

This study compared standard of care testing (SOC) to BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (PNplus). PNplus detects 15 bacteria with semiquantitative log bin values, 7 antibiotic resistance markers, three atypical bacteria (AB), and eight viral classes directly from bronchoalveolar lavage-like specimens (BLS) and sputum-like specimens (SLS). Fifty-two laboratories from 13 European countries and Israel tested 1234 BLS and 1242 SLS with PNplus and SOC. Detection rates and number of pathogens/samples were compared for PNplus pathogens. PNplus bin values and SOC quantities were compared. Three thousand two hundred sixty-two bacteria in PNplus were detected by PNplus and/or SOC. SOC detected 57.1% compared to 95.8% for PNplus (p ≤ 0.0001). PNplus semiquantitative bin values were less than SOC, equal to SOC, or greater than SOC in 5.1%, 25.4%, and 69.6% of results, respectively. PNplus bin values were on average ≥ 1 log than SOC values (58.5% 1–2 logs; 11.0% 3–4 logs). PNplus identified 98.2% of MRSA and SOC 55.6%. SOC detected 73/103 AB (70.9%) and 134/631 viruses (21.2%). PNplus detected 93/103 AB (90.3%) and 618/631 viruses (97.9%) (p ≤ 0.0001). PNplus and SOC mean number of pathogens/samples were 1.99 and 1.44, respectively. All gram-negative resistance markers were detected. PNplus and SOC results were fully or partially concordant for 49.1% and 26.4% of specimens, respectively. PNplus was highly sensitive and detected more potential pneumonia pathogens than SOC. Semiquantification may assist in understanding pathogen significance. As PNplus generates results in approximately 1 h, PNplus has potential to direct antimicrobial therapy in near real time and improve antimicrobial stewardship and patient outcomes.

Details

ISSN :
14354373 and 09349723
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c7014d9ead93eeda1e14e1ae9c1d736d