Back to Search
Start Over
Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
- Source :
- El-Toukhy, T, Campo, R, Khalaf, Y, Tabanelli, C, Gianaroli, L, Gordts, S S, Gordts, S, Mestdagh, G, Mardesic, T, Voboril, J, Marchino, G L, Benedetto, C, Al-Shawaf, T, Sabatini, L, Seed, P T, Gergolet, M, Grimbizis, G, Harb, H & Coomarasamy, A 2016, ' Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY) : a multicentre, randomised controlled trial ', Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10038, pp. 2614-2621 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00258-0
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2016.
-
Abstract
- BackgroundThe success rate of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) remains low and many women undergo multiple treatment cycles. A previous meta-analysis suggested hysteroscopy could improve outcomes in women who have had recurrent implantation failure; however, studies were of poor quality and a definitive randomised trial was needed. In the TROPHY trial we aimed to assess whether hysteroscopy improves the livebirth rate following IVF treatment in women with recurrent failure of implantation.MethodsWe did a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in eight hospitals in the UK, Belgium, Italy, and the Czech Republic. We recruited women younger than 38 years who had normal ultrasound of the uterine cavity and history of two to four unsuccessful IVF cycles. We used an independent web-based trial management system to randomly assign (1:1) women to receive outpatient hysteroscopy (hysteroscopy group) or no hysteroscopy (control group) in the month before starting a treatment cycle of IVF (with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection). A computer-based algorithm minimised for key prognostic variables: age, body-mass index, basal follicle-stimulating hormone concentration, and the number of previous failed IVF cycles. The order of group assignment was masked to the researchers at the time of recruitment and randomisation. Embryologists involved in the embryo transfer were masked to group allocation, but physicians doing the procedure knew of group assignment and had hysteroscopy findings accessible. Participants were not masked to their group assignment. The primary outcome was the livebirth rate (proportion of women who had a live baby beyond 24 weeks of gestation) in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN35859078.FindingsBetween Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2013, we randomly assigned 350 women to the hysteroscopy group and 352 women to the control group. 102 (29%) of women in the hysteroscopy group had a livebirth after IVF compared with 102 (29%) women in the control group (risk ratio 1·0, 95% CI 0·79–1·25; p=0·96). No hysteroscopy-related adverse events were reported.InterpretationOutpatient hysteroscopy before IVF in women with a normal ultrasound of the uterine cavity and a history of unsuccessful IVF treatment cycles does not improve the livebirth rate. Further research into the effectiveness of surgical correction of specific uterine cavity abnormalities before IVF is warranted.FundingEuropean Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy.
- Subjects :
- Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
Fertilization in Vitro
Hysteroscopy
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Pregnancy
Recurrence
law
medicine
Humans
Treatment Failure
030212 general & internal medicine
education
education.field_of_study
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine
In vitro fertilisation
medicine.diagnostic_test
Obstetrics
business.industry
Medicine (all)
General Medicine
Europe
medicine.anatomical_structure
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Infertility
Relative risk
Female
Infertility, Female
Live Birth
Uterine cavity
Live birth
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 01406736
- Volume :
- 387
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Lancet
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c833544b48e8c51a492e5fd5b2fbc86e
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00258-0