Back to Search Start Over

Everolimus-Eluting Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Authors :
Hyuck Moon Kwon
Hyeon Cheol Gwon
Myung Ho Jeong
Hui Kyung Jeon
Byung Ok Kim
In Ho Chae
Jung Han Yoon
Hyun-Jae Kang
Dong Woon Jeon
Kyoo Rok Han
Nam Ho Lee
Hae Young Lee
Young Jin Choi
Hyo-Soo Kim
Sang Ho Jo
Si Hoon Park
Taek Jong Hong
Yangsoo Jang
Woo-Young Chung
Do Sun Lim
Bon Kwon Koo
Seung Ho Hur
Han Mo Yang
Taehoon Ahn
Kyung Woo Park
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 58:1844-1854
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2011.

Abstract

Objectives The goal of this study was to compare the angiographic outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in a head-to-head manner. Background EES have been shown to be superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents in inhibiting late loss (LL) and clinical outcome. Whether EES may provide similar angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with SES is undetermined. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to demonstrate the noninferiority of EES compared with SES in preventing LL at 9 months. A total of 1,443 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized 3:1 to receive EES or SES. Routine follow-up angiography was recommended at 9 months. The primary endpoint was in-segment LL at 9 months, and major secondary endpoints included in-stent LL at 9 months, target lesion failure, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis at 12 months. Data were managed by an independent management center, and clinical events were adjudicated by an independent adjudication committee. Results Clinical follow-up was available in 1,428 patients and angiographic follow-up in 924 patients (1,215 lesions). The primary endpoint of the study (in-segment LL at 9 months) was 0.11 ± 0.38 mm and 0.06 ± 0.36 mm for EES and SES, respectively (p for noninferiority = 0.0382). The in-stent LL was also noninferior (EES 0.19 ± 0.35 mm; SES 0.15 ± 0.34 mm; p for noninferiority = 0.0121). The incidence of clinical endpoints was not statistically different between the 2 groups, including target lesion failure (3.75% vs. 3.05%; p = 0.53) and stent thrombosis (0.37% vs. 0.83%; p = 0.38). Conclusions EES were noninferior to SES in inhibition of LL after stenting, which was corroborated by similar rates of clinical outcomes. (Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in Reducing Late Loss After Stenting [EXCELLENT]; NCT00698607 )

Details

ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
58
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ca28d22f7fd3894836943bb8bad177c8