Back to Search Start Over

Investigating organic aerosol loading in the remote marine environment

Authors :
Steve R. Arnold
Frank Drewnick
Andrew J. Hind
Lynn M. Russell
Alexander Smirnov
Colette L. Heald
K. Lapina
Colin D. O'Dowd
S. R. Zorn
Hugh Coe
Gordon McFiggans
L. N. Hawkins
Dominick V. Spracklen
James Allan
Timothy S. Bates
Source :
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 11, Iss 17, Pp 8847-8860 (2011), Lapina, K, Heald, C L, Spracklen, D V, Arnold, S R, Allan, J D, Coe, H, McFiggans, G, Zorn, S R, Drewnick, F, Bates, T S, Hawkins, L N, Russell, L M, Smirnov, A, O'Dowd, C D & Hind, A J 2011, ' Investigating organic aerosol loading in the remote marine environment ', Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 8847-8860 . https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8847-2011
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Copernicus GmbH, 2011.

Abstract

Aerosol loading in the marine environment is investigated using aerosol composition measurements from several research ship campaigns (ICEALOT, MAP, RHaMBLe, VOCALS and OOMPH), observations of total AOD column from satellite (MODIS) and ship-based instruments (Maritime Aerosol Network, MAN), and a global chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem). This work represents the most comprehensive evaluation of oceanic OM emission inventories to date, by employing aerosol composition measurements obtained from campaigns with wide spatial and temporal coverage. The model underestimates AOD over the remote ocean on average by 0.02 (21 %), compared to satellite observations, but provides an unbiased simulation of ground-based Maritime Aerosol Network (MAN) observations. Comparison with cruise data demonstrates that the GEOS-Chem simulation of marine sulfate, with the mean observed values ranging between 0.22 μg m−3 and 1.34 μg m−3, is generally unbiased, however surface organic matter (OM) concentrations, with the mean observed concentrations between 0.07 μg m−3 and 0.77 μg m−3, are underestimated by a factor of 2–5 for the standard model run. Addition of a sub-micron marine OM source of approximately 9 TgC yr−1 brings the model into agreement with the ship-based measurements, however this additional OM source does not explain the model underestimate of marine AOD. The model underestimate of marine AOD is therefore likely the result of a combination of satellite retrieval bias and a missing marine aerosol source (which exhibits a different spatial pattern than existing aerosol in the model).

Details

ISSN :
16807324
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cc39706810455072b0eaafe4f5957919
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8847-2011