Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of prescribing practices for older adults treated by female versus male physicians: A retrospective cohort study

Authors :
Nathan Herrmann
Andrea Gruneir
Susan E. Bronskill
Vasily Giannakeas
Sharon-Lise T. Normand
Rachel D. Savage
Lynn Zhu
Dallas Seitz
Sudeep S. Gill
Jerry H. Gurwitz
Peter C. Austin
Wei Wu
Paula A. Rochon
Nathan M. Stall
Lisa McCarthy
Chaim M. Bell
Colin Faulkner
Source :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 10, p e0205524 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Importance Subtle but important differences have been described in the way that male and female physicians care for their patients, with some evidence suggesting women are more likely to adhere to best practice recommendations. Objective To determine if male and female physicians differ in their prescribing practices as measured by the initiation of lower-than-recommended dose cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) drug therapy for dementia management. Design, setting, and participants All community-dwelling Ontario residents aged 66 years and older with dementia and newly dispensed an oral ChEI drug (donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine) between April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2016 were included. Main outcome and measures The association between physician sex and the initiation of a lower than recommended-dose ChEI was examined using generalized linear mixed regression models, adjusting for patient and physician characteristics. Data were stratified by specialty. Secondary analyses explored the association between physician sex and cardiac screening as well as shorter duration of the initial prescription. Results The analysis included 3,443 female and 5,811 male physicians and the majority (83%) were family physicians, Female physicians were more likely to initiate ChEI therapy at a lower-than-recommended dose (Adjusted odds ratio = 1.43,95% confidence interval = 1.17 to 1.74). Compared to their male counterparts, female physicians were also more likely to follow other conservative prescribing practices including cardiac screening (55.1% vs. 49.2%, P-value

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
13
Issue :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PloS one
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cca6731153f5cb9381bfd64f0118ab9f