Back to Search Start Over

Prehospital high-dose tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. The AGIR-2 study

Authors :
El Khoury, C.
Dubien, P-Y.
Belle, L.
Debaty, G.
Capel, O.
Perret, T.
Savary, D.
Serre, P.
Bonnefoy-Cudraz, E.
Bissery, A.
Ecochard, René
Plattner, V.
Mercier, Catherine
Département biostatistiques et modélisation pour la santé et l'environnement [LBBE]
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive - UMR 5558 (LBBE)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)
Source :
Archives of cardiovascular diseases, Archives of cardiovascular diseases, 2010, 103 (5), pp.285-292. ⟨10.1016/j.acvd.2010.04.005⟩, Archives of cardiovascular diseases, Elsevier/French Society of Cardiology, 2010, 103 (5), pp.285-292
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Summary Background Compared with administration in the catheterization laboratory, early treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors provides benefits to patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous intervention. Whether this benefit is maintained on top of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is unknown. Methods In a multicentre, controlled, randomized study, 320 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention received a high-dose bolus of tirofiban given either in the ambulance (prehospital group) or in the catheterization laboratory. The primary endpoint was a TIMI flow grade 2–3 of the infarct-related vessel at initial angiography. Secondary endpoints included ST-segment resolution 1 h after percutaneous coronary intervention and peak serum troponin I concentration. Results Tirofiban was administered 48 (95% confidence interval 21.4–75.0) min earlier in the prehospital group. At initial angiography, the combined incidence of TIMI 2–3 flow was 39.7% in the catheterization-laboratory group and 44.2% in the prehospital group ( p = 0.45). No difference was found on postpercutaneous intervention angiography or peak troponin concentration. Complete ST-segment resolution 60 min after the start of intervention was 55.4% in the catheterization-laboratory group and 52.6% in the prehospital group ( p = 0.32). Conclusion Prehospital initiation of high-dose bolus tirofiban did not improve significantly initial TIMI 2 or 3 flow of the infarct-related artery or complete ST-segment resolution after coronary intervention compared with initiation of tirofiban in the catheterization laboratory ( NCT00538317 ).

Details

ISSN :
18752128 and 18752136
Volume :
103
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Archives of cardiovascular diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cdfb0be06fb30e510fe52eaa3768aed1
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2010.04.005⟩