Back to Search Start Over

Factors associated with long diagnostic delay in celiac disease

Authors :
Markku Mäki
Katri Kaukinen
Heini Huhtala
Valma Fuchs
Kalle Kurppa
Pekka Collin
Source :
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 49:1304-1310
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, 2014.

Abstract

Here, we investigated the factors associated with long diagnostic delay in celiac disease and the impact of the national Current Care Guidelines in reducing the delay.This population-based study involved 825 adult celiac disease patients. The diagnosis was considered delayed when the interval between first symptoms and diagnosis was10 years. The patients were asked about the duration and type of symptoms before diagnosis, time and site (tertiary, secondary, or primary care) of the diagnosis, family history of the disease, and presence of significant comorbidities. Analysis was performed by binary logistic regression.Altogether, 261 (32%) out of 825 participants reported a diagnostic delay of10 years. Female gender, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders and presence of diarrhea, abdominal pain, and malabsorption were associated with prolonged delay. Male gender, diagnosis after the introduction of the first Current Care Guidelines in 1997, and being detected by serological screening, and family history of celiac disease were associated with a lower risk of delayed diagnosis. Factors not associated with the delay were site of diagnosis, age, and presence of dermatitis herpetiformis, type 1 diabetes, or thyroidal disease.The number of long diagnostic delays in celiac disease has decreased over the past decades. The shift of diagnostics from secondary and tertiary care to primary care has not been detrimental. National guidelines together with increased awareness and active screening in at-risk groups of celiac disease are important in these circumstances.

Details

ISSN :
15027708 and 00365521
Volume :
49
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ce4e4dcf7ed2d5d1e28c3b425189aaa0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2014.923502