Back to Search Start Over

The Era of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: 'Class Action' or not? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors :
Nicoletta Staropoli
Pierfrancesco Tassone
Vito Barbieri
Angela Salvino
Pierosandro Tagliaferri
Domenico Ciliberto
Teresa Del Giudice
Francesco Grillone
Antonio Russo
Maria Cucè
Eleonora Iuliano
Staropoli, Nicoletta
Ciliberto, Domenico
Del Giudice, Teresa
Iuliano, Eleonora
Cucè, Maria
Grillone, Francesco
Salvino, Angela
Barbieri, Vito
Russo, Antonio
Tassone, Pierfrancesco
Tagliaferri, Pierosandro
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 2018.

Abstract

Introduction Carboplatin is the milestone of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treatment, thus response to platinum is the major prognostic factor. Among platinum-sensitive patients, 40% carry a germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutation. In this scenario a new class of drugs, the PARP inhibitors (PARPis), produced a significant improvement in long-term disease control. In order to make an aggregate evaluation of the impact of these agents, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients and Methods Clinical trials were selected by searching “Pubmed” database and abstracts from major cancer meetings. We considered the January 2008 - April 2018 time frame. Progression free survival (PFS) was the primary end-point, toxicities were secondary end-points. Hazard ratios (HRs) of PFS, with confidence intervals, and risk ratios of grade 3–4 toxicity rates, were extracted from retrieved studies and included in the current analysis. Meta-analysis was carried out by the fixed and random effect models. We conducted this meta-analysis to also compare indirectly the efficacy of different PARPis in EOC patients. Results Five randomized trials for a total of 1839 patients were selected and included in the final analysis. In particular, we evaluated a BRCA-mutant cohort (871 patients) with a pooled HR 0.25 (95%CI 0.21-0.31) and the BRCA-wild type cohort (836 patients) with a pooled HR 0.41 (95%CI 0.31-0.55), respectively. Regarding safety profile, no significant differences were detected in all grade toxicities, however, taking into account 3–4 grade toxicities and SAEs (severe adverse events), we show that rucaparib-treated patients reported major abdominal pain events, while niraparib-treated patients were associated with the highest percentage of haematological toxicities, hypothesizing a drug effect for the safety analysis. In the indirect comparisons, significant differences were not detected on PFS for the different agents. Conclusions We confirm a significant benefit in survival outcome of PARPis for EOC patients with a “class effect” on the bases of narrow CI and indirect comparisons in the different groups. Therefore, we underline that this strategy is of special value in BRCA-mutated patients because genetic testing allows best patient selection for all PARPis with the added value of individualized prevention in familiars.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ce94b6b66d1bf4982c1662dd47dbf8ac