Back to Search Start Over

Which anthropometric measures best reflect neonatal adiposity?

Authors :
Izzuddin M. Aris
Marielle V. Fortier
Keith M. Godfrey
Yung Seng Lee
Kok Hian Tan
L P-C Shek
Y.S. Chong
Michael S. Kramer
Peter D. Gluckman
S-Y Chan
M-T Tint
Victor Samuel Rajadurai
L-W Chen
Fabian Yap
Source :
International journal of obesity (2005). 42(3)
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Studying the determinants and the long-term consequences of fetal adipose accretion requires accurate assessment of neonatal body composition. In large epidemiological studies, in-depth body composition measurement methods are usually not feasible for cost and logistical reasons, and there is a need to identify anthropometric measures that adequately reflect neonatal adiposity. Methods In a multiethnic Asian mother-offspring cohort in Singapore, anthropometric measures (weight, length, abdominal circumference, skinfold thicknesses) were measured using standardized protocols in newborn infants, and anthropometric indices [weight/length, weight/length2 (body mass index, BMI), weight/length3 (ponderal index, PI)] derived. Neonatal total adiposity was measured using air displacement plethysmography (ADP) and abdominal adiposity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Correlations of the anthropometric measures with ADP- and MRI-based adiposity were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients (rp), including in subsamples stratified by sex and ethnicity. Results Study neonates (n =251) had a mean (SD) age of 10.2 (2.5) days. Correlations between ADP-based fat mass (ADPFM) and anthropometric measures were moderate (rp range: 0.44-0.67), with the strongest being with weight/length, weight, BMI and sum of skinfolds (rp =0.67, 0.66, 0.62, 0.62, respectively, all P

Details

ISSN :
14765497
Volume :
42
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International journal of obesity (2005)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cebfadb1a4cd126509885918c66ae511