Back to Search
Start Over
Assessment of Left Ventricular Volumes with Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Real-Life Evaluation of Standard versus New Semiautomatic Methods
- Source :
- Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 27:1017-1024
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2014.
-
Abstract
- Background Routine quantitative assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes with echocardiography is hindered by time-consuming methods requiring a manual trace of the LV cavity from two apical two-dimensional planes. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate faster new semiautomatic echocardiographic methods that could represent a feasible alternative for the assessment of LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in clinical practice. Methods Two semiautomatic methods, the automated EF (Auto-EF) for two-dimensional echocardiography and the 4D Auto LVQ tool for three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), were compared with the biplane modified Simpson's method and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in 47 patients. To evaluate the accuracy of volumetry, additional in vitro measurements using water-filled latex balloons were performed with both modalities. Results Results of balloon volumetry by echocardiography and CMR measurements were in good agreement with real balloon volumes. The mean LV EF was 45 ± 11% by Auto-EF, 45 ± 11% by 3DE, 48 ± 11% by Simpson's method, and 54 ± 12% by CMR. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses showed good associations for semiautomatic methods with Simpson's method (Auto-EF, r = 0.85, bias = 3%, limits of agreement [LOA] = 12%; 3DE, r = 0.79, bias = 3%, LOA = 14%), as well as with CMR (Auto-EF, r = 0.74, bias = 9%, LOA = 17%; 3DE, r = 0.73, bias = 9%, LOA = 17%). Intra- and interobserver variability were 6% and 12% with Auto-EF and 8% and 11% with 3DE, respectively. Conclusions Good correlations between semiautomatic echocardiographic parameters for assessment of LV volumes and EF could be observed when compared with Simpson's method or CMR. However, intertechnique agreement analysis of absolute LV volumes revealed considerable differences, with significant underestimation of volumes and EF with respect to CMR.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Balloon
Sensitivity and Specificity
Pattern Recognition, Automated
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Internal medicine
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
End-systolic volume
Ejection fraction
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Limits of agreement
Reproducibility of Results
Stroke Volume
Stroke volume
Middle Aged
Echocardiography
Cardiology
End-diastolic volume
Female
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiac magnetic resonance
Nuclear medicine
business
Algorithms
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 08947317
- Volume :
- 27
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....cec2b51b34a1c3272aa950bcab209c57
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.07.006