Back to Search Start Over

Ditylenchus dipsaci Filipjev 1936

Authors :
Hashemi, Kobra
Karegar, Akbar
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Zenodo, 2019.

Abstract

3. Ditylenchus dipsaci (Kühn, 1857) Filipjev, 1936 191 females: L = 1140 (878–1510) µm; stylet = 10.5 (9–13) µm; pharynx = 177 (143–221) µm; tail = 77.6 (53–105) µm; a = 46.1 (29.5–62.5; in one specimen = 18.5); b = 6.5 (5.0–8.4); c = 14.8 (11.5–25.7); c′ = 5.4 (3.7–7.7); V = 80.4 (75.8–87.3; in one specimen = 69.6); V ′ = 86.3 (74.1–93.9); PUS / VBW = 2.6 (1.5–3.6); PUS /V-A = 43.4 (25.6–77.8) %; V-A/T = 1.8 (0.8–2.4; in one specimen = 3.9). 134 males: L = 1103 (877–1346) µm; stylet = 10.5 (9.5–12) µm; pharynx = 175 (130–210) μm; tail = 76.5 (58–99) μm; a = 48.4 (33.8–66.5); b = 6.3 (5.2–8.1); c = 14.5 (12.0–18.3); c′ = 5.1 (3.5–7.4); spicules = 23.7 (20–28) µm. Diagnosis. D. dipsaci is distinguished by its long, slender body, four lateral field incisures (sometimes with one to three additional lines), well-developed cephalic skeleton, moderately large stylet with distinct rounded knobs, moderately-developed median bulb with distinct valve, variable shape of basal pharyngeal bulb (usually long and cylindrical, sometimes pyriform and shorter, sometimes with a short stem), basal pharyngeal bulb usually with slight intestinal overlap, averaging 5 µm (seldom up to 29 µm) and sometimes offset, posterior position of vulva, long post-vulval uterine sac, thick tail with usually pointed, but sometimes dull tip, and long spicules. The Iranian populations of D. dipsaci are similar to D. angustus (Butler, 1913) Filipjev, 1936, D. gigas Vovlas, Troccoli, Palomares-Rius, De Luca, Liébanas, Landa, Subbotin & Castillo, 2011, D. laurae Skwiercz, Kornobis, Winiszewska, Przybylska, Obrępalska-Stęplowska, Gawlak & Subbotin, 2017, D. solani, D. sturhani Mirbabaei Karani, Eskandari, Ghaderi, Heydari, & Miraeez, 2017 and D. weischeri Chizhov, Borisov & Subbotin, 2010. They differs from D. angustus by relatively longer spicules (20–28 vs. 16–21 μm), less bursa/tail% (24.8–85.2 vs. approximately 100%), different shape of basal pharyngeal bulb (long and cylindrical vs. clavate). It can be distinguished from D. laurae by shorter body (878–1510 vs. 1523–2095 μm), shorter tail (53–105 vs. 104–127 μm), less a index (18.5–62.5 vs. 72.5–103) and PUS / VBW (1.5–3.6 vs. 4.3–5.6), shorter basal pharyngeal bulb (length/width = 1.9–5.8 vs. approximately 10) and the shape of tail tip (usually pointed vs. mucronate), from D. solani by having longer spicules (20–28 vs. 18–20 μm), the shape of basal pharyngeal bulb and tail tip (long and cylindrical and usually pointed vs. pyriform and dull to rounded, respectively), from D. sturhani with longer body 878–1510 vs. 656–865 μm), longer spicules (20–28 vs. 18.5–20.5 μm), greater PUS / VBW (2.6 (1.5–3.6) vs. 1.4 (1.0–1.9)) and different shape of tail tip (usually pointed vs. usually dull), from D. weischeri with greater c′ index (5.4 (3.7–7.7) vs. 3.7 (2.9–4.8)). In the description of D. weischeri, other differences with D. dipsaci such as shorter tail and spicules, greater c index, V-A, V-A/T and PUS length are also noted, that falls within the range of variation of different D. dispaci populations in the present study and are not useful. The closest species to D. dipsaci is D. gigas, which is distinguished only with shorter body length (878–1510 vs. 1270–1932 μm).<br />Published as part of Hashemi, Kobra & Karegar, Akbar, 2019, Description of Ditylenchus paraparvus n. sp. from Iran with an updated list of Ditylenchus Filipjev, 1936 (Nematoda: Anguinidae), pp. 85-113 in Zootaxa 4651 (1) on page 91, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4651.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/3359134<br />{"references":["Kuhn, J. (1857) Uber Das Vorkommen von Anguillulen in erkrankten Bluthenkopfen von Dipsacus fullonum L. Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 9, 129 - 137.","Filipjev, I. N. (1936) On the classification of the Tylenchinae. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 3, 80 - 82.","Butler, E. J. (1913) Disease of rice: An eelworm disease of rice. Bulletin Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, Bulletin, 34, 1 - 37.","Vovlas, N., Troccoli, A., Palomares-Rius, J. E., De Luca, F., Liebanas, G., Landa, B. B., Subbotin, S. A. & Castillo, P. (2011) Ditylenchus gigas n. sp. parasitizing broad bean: a new stem nematode singled out from the Ditylenchus dipsaci species complex using a polyphasic approach with molecular phylogeny. Plant Pathology, 60, 762 - 775. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 3059.2011.02430. x","Skwiercz, A. T., Kornobis, F. W., Winiszewska, G., Przybylska, A., Obrepalska-Steplowska, A., Gawlak, M. & Subbotin, S. A. (2017) Ditylenchus laurae n. sp. (Tylenchida: Anguinidae) from Poland-a new species of the D. dipsaci complex associated with a water plant, Potamogeton perfoliatus L. Nematology, 19, 197 - 209. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 15685411 - 00003040","Chizhov, V. N., Borisov, B. A. & Subbotin, S. A. (2010) A new stem nematode, Ditylenchus weischeri n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchida), a parasite of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. in the Central Region of the Non-Chernozem Zone Russia. Russian Journal of Nematology, 18, 95 - 102."]}

Details

ISSN :
15685411
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ced714beb7985dd0a339106ccd3f61be
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5587124