Back to Search Start Over

Monitoring regulatory T cells in clinical samples: consensus on an essential marker set and gating strategy for regulatory T cell analysis by flow cytometry

Authors :
Alessandra Battaglia
Cedrik M. Britten
Awen Gallimore
Andrew James Godkin
Judith R. Kroep
Marij J. P. Welters
Eveline M. Dijkgraaf
Cécile Gouttefangeas
Ethan M. Shevach
Saskia J. A. M. Santegoets
Tanja D. de Gruijl
Sjoerd H. van der Burg
Alexander Scheffold
Hans J. P. M. Koenen
Theresa L. Whiteside
Janet Staats
Kjetil Taskén
Philipp Beckhove
Medical oncology laboratory
CCA - Disease profiling
Source :
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 64(10), 1271-1286, Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy, 64, 10, pp. 1271-1286, Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy, 64(10), 1271-1286. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy, 64, 1271-1286, Santegoets, S J A M, Dijkgraaf, E M, Battaglia, A, Beckhove, P, Britten, C M, Gallimore, A, Godkin, A, Gouttefangeas, C, de Gruijl, T D, Koenen, H J P M, Scheffold, A, Shevach, E M, Staats, J, Tasken, K, Whiteside, T L, Kroep, J R, Welters, M J P & van der Burg, S H 2015, ' Monitoring regulatory T cells in clinical samples: consensus on an essential marker set and gating strategy for regulatory T cell analysis by flow cytometry ', Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1271-1286 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-015-1729-x
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Regulatory T cell (Treg)-mediated immunosuppression is considered a major obstacle for successful cancer immunotherapy. The association between clinical outcome and Tregs is being studied extensively in clinical trials, but unfortunately, no consensus has been reached about (a) the markers and (b) the gating strategy required to define human Tregs in this context, making it difficult to draw final conclusions. Therefore, we have organized an international workshop on the detection and functional testing of Tregs with leading experts in the field, and 40 participants discussing different analyses and the importance of different markers and context in which Tregs were analyzed. This resulted in a rationally composed ranking list of “Treg markers”. Subsequently, the proposed Treg markers were tested to get insight into the overlap/differences between the most frequently used Treg definitions and their utility for Treg detection in various human tissues. Here, we conclude that the CD3, CD4, CD25, CD127, and FoxP3 markers are the minimally required markers to define human Treg cells. Staining for Ki67 and CD45RA showed to provide additional information on the activation status of Tregs. The use of markers was validated in a series of PBMC from healthy donors and cancer patients, as well as in tumor-draining lymph nodes and freshly isolated tumors. In conclusion, we propose an essential marker set comprising antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD25, CD127, Foxp3, Ki67, and CD45RA and a corresponding robust gating strategy for the context-dependent analysis of Tregs by flow cytometry. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00262-015-1729-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03407004
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 64(10), 1271-1286, Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy, 64, 10, pp. 1271-1286, Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy, 64(10), 1271-1286. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy, 64, 1271-1286, Santegoets, S J A M, Dijkgraaf, E M, Battaglia, A, Beckhove, P, Britten, C M, Gallimore, A, Godkin, A, Gouttefangeas, C, de Gruijl, T D, Koenen, H J P M, Scheffold, A, Shevach, E M, Staats, J, Tasken, K, Whiteside, T L, Kroep, J R, Welters, M J P & van der Burg, S H 2015, ' Monitoring regulatory T cells in clinical samples: consensus on an essential marker set and gating strategy for regulatory T cell analysis by flow cytometry ', Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1271-1286 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-015-1729-x
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cf307174b5cc1c8c4a7c4f9d98207975
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-015-1729-x