Back to Search Start Over

Proactive breast cancer risk assessment in primary care: a review based on the principles of screening

Authors :
Juliet A. Usher-Smith
Sarah Hindmarch
David P. French
Marc Tischkowitz
Sowmiya Moorthie
Fiona M. Walter
Rebecca A. Dennison
Francisca Stutzin Donoso
Stephanie Archer
Lily Taylor
Jon Emery
Stephen Morris
Douglas F. Easton
Antonis C. Antoniou
Usher-Smith, Juliet A [0000-0002-8501-2531]
Hindmarch, Sarah [0000-0002-9549-1177]
French, David P [0000-0002-7663-7804]
Moorthie, Sowmiya [0000-0002-7790-2630]
Dennison, Rebecca A [0000-0002-0847-0723]
Taylor, Lily [0000-0002-0832-9244]
Emery, Jon [0000-0002-5274-6336]
Morris, Stephen [0000-0002-5828-3563]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, 2023.

Abstract

Funder: Manchester Cancer Research Centre<br />Funder: East of England Clinical Academic Reserve<br />In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that women at moderate or high risk of breast cancer be offered risk-reducing medication and enhanced breast screening/surveillance. In June 2022, NICE withdrew a statement recommending assessment of risk in primary care only when women present with concerns. This shift to the proactive assessment of risk substantially changes the role of primary care, in effect paving the way for a primary care-based screening programme to identify those at moderate or high risk of breast cancer. In this article, we review the literature surrounding proactive breast cancer risk assessment within primary care against the consolidated framework for screening. We find that risk assessment for women under 50 years currently satisfies many of the standard principles for screening. Most notably, there are large numbers of women at moderate or high risk currently unidentified, risk models exist that can identify those women with reasonable accuracy, and management options offer the opportunity to reduce breast cancer incidence and mortality in that group. However, there remain a number of uncertainties and research gaps, particularly around the programme/system requirements, that need to be addressed before these benefits can be realised.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cf64e6a6fd16e590aeb21edaf32d91d4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.92637