Back to Search Start Over

Stiffness-Optimized Ankle-Foot Orthoses Improve Walking Energy Cost Compared to Conventional Orthoses in Neuromuscular Disorders: A Prospective Uncontrolled Intervention Study

Authors :
Frans Nollet
Jaap Harlaar
Fieke S. Koopman
Jasper J. den Boer
Viola C. Altmann
Merel-Anne Brehm
Niels F.J. Waterval
AMS - Rehabilitation & Development
Rehabilitation medicine
Amsterdam Movement Sciences
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D)
Source :
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28(10):9174749, 2296-2304. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28(10), Waterval, N F J, Brehm, M A, Altmann, V C, Koopman, F S, Den Boer, J J, Harlaar, J & Nollet, F 2020, ' Stiffness-Optimized Ankle-Foot Orthoses Improve Walking Energy Cost Compared to Conventional Orthoses in Neuromuscular Disorders : A Prospective Uncontrolled Intervention Study ', IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 28, no. 10, 9174749, pp. 2296-2304 . https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3018786, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 28(10):9174749, 2296-2304. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

In persons with calf muscle weakness, walking energy cost is commonly increased due to persistent knee flexion and a diminished push-off. Provided ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) usually lower walking energy cost. To maximize the reduction in energy cost, AFO bending stiffness should be individually optimized, but this is not common practice. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether individually stiffness-optimized AFOs reduce walking energy cost compared to conventional AFOs in persons with non-spastic calf muscle weakness and, secondarily, whether stiffness-optimized AFOs improve walking speed and gait biomechanics. Thirty-seven persons with non-spastic calf muscle weakness using a conventional AFO were included. Participants were provided a new, individually stiffness-optimized AFO. Walking energy cost, speed and gait biomechanics were assessed, at delivery and 3-months follow-up. Stiffness-optimized AFOs reduced walking energy cost with 9.2% (-0.42J/kg/m, 95%CI: 0.26 to 0.57) compared to the conventional AFOs while walking speed increased with 5.2% (+0.05m/s, 95%CI: 0.03 to 0.08). In bilateral affected persons the effects were larger compared to unilateral affected persons (difference effect energy cost: 0.31J/kg/m, speed: +0.09m/s). Although individually gait biomechanics changed considerably, no significant group differences were found (p > 0.118). We demonstrated that individually stiffness-optimized AFOs considerably and meaningfully reduced walking energy cost compared to conventional AFOs, which was accompanied by an increase in walking speed. Especially in bilateral affected persons large effects of stiffness-optimization were found. The individual differences in gait changes substantiate the recommendation that the AFO bending stiffness should be individually tuned to minimize walking energy cost.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15344320
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28(10):9174749, 2296-2304. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28(10), Waterval, N F J, Brehm, M A, Altmann, V C, Koopman, F S, Den Boer, J J, Harlaar, J & Nollet, F 2020, ' Stiffness-Optimized Ankle-Foot Orthoses Improve Walking Energy Cost Compared to Conventional Orthoses in Neuromuscular Disorders : A Prospective Uncontrolled Intervention Study ', IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 28, no. 10, 9174749, pp. 2296-2304 . https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3018786, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 28(10):9174749, 2296-2304. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cff30f25d9c62c368edb549828743143
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3018786