Back to Search Start Over

An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models. Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns

Authors :
Terje Koren Berntsen
Marcus O. Köhler
Didier A. Hauglustaine
D. Brunner
Johannes Staehelin
John A. Pyle
Line Jourdain
Giovanni Pitari
Helen Rogers
Ivar S. A. Isaksen
Volker Grewe
Robert Sausen
Michael Gauss
P. F. J. van Velthoven
Eva Mancini
E. W. Meijer
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science [Zürich] (IAC)
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich] (ETH Zürich)
Centre for Atmospheric Science [Cambridge, UK]
University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM)
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Modelling the Earth Response to Multiple Anthropogenic Interactions and Dynamics (MERMAID)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Service d'aéronomie (SA)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Department of Geosciences [Oslo]
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences [Oslo]
University of Oslo (UiO)-University of Oslo (UiO)
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI)
Dipartimento di Fisica [L'Aquila]
Università degli Studi dell'Aquila = University of L'Aquila (UNIVAQ)
DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre (IPA)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt [Oberpfaffenhofen-Wessling] (DLR)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
Università degli Studi dell'Aquila (UNIVAQ)
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich [Zürich] (ETH Zürich)
Università degli Studi dell'Aquila [L'Aquila] (UNIVAQ.IT)
Source :
Scopus-Elsevier, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 107-129 (2005), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5 (1), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2005, 5 (1), pp.107-129. ⟨10.5194/acp-5-107-2005⟩, ResearcherID, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, European Geosciences Union, 2005, 5 (1), pp.107-129. ⟨10.5194/acp-5-107-2005⟩, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, European Geosciences Union, 2004, 4 (6), pp.7355-7402
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

International audience; This is the second part of a rigorous model evaluation study involving five global Chemistry-Transport and two Chemistry-Climate Models operated by different groups in Europe. Simulated trace gas fields were interpolated to the exact times and positions of the observations to account for the actual weather conditions and hence for the specific histories of the sampled air masses. In this part of the study we focus on a detailed comparison with two selected campaigns, PEM-Tropics A and SONEX, contrasting the clean environment of the tropical Pacific with the more polluted North Atlantic region. The study highlights the different strengths and weaknesses of the models in accurately simulating key processes in the UT/LS region including stratosphere-troposphere-exchange, rapid convective transport, lightning emissions, radical chemistry and ozone production. Model simulated Radon, which was used as an idealized tracer for continental influence, was occasionally much better correlated with measured CO than simulated CO pointing towards deficiencies in the used biomass burning emission fields. The abundance and variability of HOx radicals is in general well represented in the models as inferred directly from the comparison with measured OH and HO2 and indirectly from the comparison with hydrogen peroxide concentrations. Components of the NOy family such as PAN, HNO3 and NO were found to compare less favorably. Interestingly, models showing good agreement with observations in the case of PEM-Tropics A often failed in the case of SONEX and vice versa. A better description of NOx and NOy emissions, chemistry and sinks is thought to be key to future model improvements with respect to the representation of chemistry in the UT/LS region.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16807316, 16807324, 16807367, and 16807375
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scopus-Elsevier, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 107-129 (2005), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5 (1), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2005, 5 (1), pp.107-129. ⟨10.5194/acp-5-107-2005⟩, ResearcherID, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, European Geosciences Union, 2005, 5 (1), pp.107-129. ⟨10.5194/acp-5-107-2005⟩, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, European Geosciences Union, 2004, 4 (6), pp.7355-7402
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d03de075078bb15d130b1b9751ab25ae
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-107-2005⟩