Back to Search Start Over

CORE-IBD: A Multidisciplinary International Consensus Initiative to Develop a Core Outcome Set for Randomized Controlled Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Authors :
Christopher Ma
Jurij Hanzel
Remo Panaccione
William J. Sandborn
Geert R. D’Haens
Vineet Ahuja
Raja Atreya
Charles N. Bernstein
Peter Bossuyt
Brian Bressler
Robert V. Bryant
Benjamin Cohen
Jean-Frederic Colombel
Silvio Danese
Axel Dignass
Marla C. Dubinsky
Phillip R. Fleshner
Richard B. Gearry
Stephen B. Hanauer
Ailsa Hart
Paulo Gustavo Kotze
Torsten Kucharzik
Peter L. Lakatos
Rupert W. Leong
Fernando Magro
Julian Panés
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Zhihua Ran
Miguel Regueiro
Siddharth Singh
Antonino Spinelli
A. Hillary Steinhart
Simon P. Travis
C. Janneke van der Woude
Bruce Yacyshyn
Takayuki Yamamoto
Matthieu Allez
Willem A. Bemelman
Amy L. Lightner
Edouard Louis
David T. Rubin
Ellen J. Scherl
Corey A. Siegel
Mark S. Silverberg
Severine Vermeire
Claire E. Parker
Stefanie C. McFarlane
Leonardo Guizzetti
Michelle I. Smith
Niels Vande Casteele
Brian G. Feagan
Vipul Jairath
Collaborators, CORE-IBD
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
Surgery
Source :
Gastroenterology, 163(4), 950-964. W.B. Saunders, Gastroenterology, 163(4), 950-964. W.B. Saunders Ltd
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: End points to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are evolving. Given the heterogeneity in current outcome measures, harmonizing end points in a core outcome set for randomized controlled trials is a priority for drug development in inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Candidate outcome domains and outcome measures were generated from systematic literature reviews and patient engagement surveys and interviews. An iterative Delphi process was conducted to establish consensus: panelists anonymously voted on items using a 9-point Likert scale, and feedback was incorporated between rounds to refine statements. Consensus meetings were held to ratify the outcome domains and core outcome measures. Stakeholders were recruited internationally, and included gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons, methodologists, and clinical trialists. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients and 53 experts participated. Patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, endoscopy, biomarkers, and safety were considered core domains; histopathology was an additional domain for UC. In CD, there was consensus to use the 2-item patient-reported outcome (ie, abdominal pain and stool frequency), Crohn's Disease Activity Index, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, and co-primary end points of symptomatic remission and endoscopic response. In UC, there was consensus to use the 9-point Mayo Clinic Score, fecal urgency, Robarts Histopathology Index or Geboes Score, fecal calprotectin, and a composite primary end point including both symptomatic and endoscopic remission. Safety outcomes should be reported using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary collaboration involving patients and clinical experts has produced the first core outcome set that can be applied to randomized controlled trials of CD and UC. ispartof: GASTROENTEROLOGY vol:163 issue:4 pages:950-964 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Details

ISSN :
15280012 and 00165085
Volume :
163
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gastroenterology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d1621d7255b59bd435bc53e039201424