Back to Search Start Over

Redefining Palliative Care-A New Consensus-Based Definition

Authors :
Carlos Centeno
Quach T. Khan
Liliana De Lima
Katherine Pettus
Jin-Sun Yong
Lukas Radbruch
Julia Downing
Roberto Wenk
Dingle Spence
M. R. Rajagopal
Richard Harding
Esther Munyoro
James F. Cleary
Kathleen M. Foley
Mhoira Leng
Roger Woodruff
Sébastien Moine
Odette Spruijt
Claudia Burla
Zipporah Ali
Phillippe Larkin
Christina M. Puchalski
Hibah Osman
Sushma Bhatnaghar
Bee Wee
Wendy Gomez-Garcia
Chitra Venkateswaran
Joan Marston
Charmaine Blanchard
Emmanuel Luyirika
Stephen R. Connor
Rosa Buitrago
Tania Pastrana
Eduardo Bruera
Odontuya Davaasuren
Mary Callaway
Felicia Marie Knaul
Cynthia Goh
Source :
Journal of pain and symptom management, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 754-764, Journal of pain and symptom management
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: The International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care (IAHPC) developed a consensus-based definition of palliative care (PC) that focuses on the relief of serious health related suffering, a concept put forward by the Lancet Commission Global Access to Palliative Care and Pain Relief. Aim: The objective of this paper is to present the research behind the new definition. Methods: The three-phased consensus process involved health care workers from countries in all income levels. In phase one, 38 PC experts evaluated the components of the World Health Organization (WHO) definition and suggested new/revised ones. In phase two, 412 IAHPC members in 88 countries expressed their level of agreement with the suggested components. In phase three, using results from phase two, the expert panel developed the definition. Results: The consensus-based definition is “Palliative care is the active holistic care of individuals across all ages with serious health-related suffering due to severe illness and especially of those near the end of life. It aims to improve the quality of life of patients, their families and their caregivers.” The definition includes a number of bullet points with additional details as well as recommendations for governments to reduce barriers to palliative care. Conclusions: Participants had significantly different perceptions and interpretations of PC. The greatest challenge faced by the core group was trying to find a middle ground between those who think that PC is the relief of all suffering, and those who believe that PC describes the care of those with a very limited remaining life span.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of pain and symptom management, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 754-764, Journal of pain and symptom management
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d1bf6a503b962997469fe801fb0df9d0