Back to Search Start Over

Observational training in visual half-fields and the coding of movement sequences

Authors :
Arnaud Boutin
Joerg Schorer
Lennart Fischer
Charles H. Shea
Yannick Blandin
Thomas Ellenbuerger
Stefan Panzer
Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage (CeRCA)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Tours-Université de Poitiers
Sport Sciences
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU)
Health and Kinesiology
Texas A&M University [College Station]
This work was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (PA 774/8-1) and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-08-FASHS-14).
Université de Poitiers-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Human Movement Science, Human Movement Science, Elsevier, 2012, 31 (6), pp.1436-48. ⟨10.1016/j.humov.2012.06.007⟩
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2012.

Abstract

International audience; An experiment was conducted to determine if gating information to different hemispheres during observational training facilitates the development of a movement representation. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three observation groups that differed in terms of the type of visual half-field presentation during observation (right visual half-field (RVF), left visual half-field (LVF), or in central position (CE)), and a control group (CG). On Day 1, visual stimuli indicating the pattern of movement to be produced were projected on the respective hemisphere. The task participants observed was a 1300 ms spatial-temporal pattern of elbow flexions and extensions. On Day 2, participants physically performed the task in an inter-manual transfer paradigm with a retention test, and two contralateral transfer tests; a mirror transfer test which required the same pattern of muscle activation and limb joint angles and a non-mirror transfer test which reinstated the visual-spatial pattern of the sequence. The results demonstrated that participants of the CE, RVF and the LVF groups showed superior retention and transfer performance compared to participants of the CG. Participants of the CE- and LVF-groups demonstrated an advantage when the visual-spatial coordinates were reinstated compared to the motor coordinates, while participants of the RVF-group did not promote specific transfer patterns. These results will be discussed in the context of hemisphere specialization.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01679457
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Human Movement Science, Human Movement Science, Elsevier, 2012, 31 (6), pp.1436-48. ⟨10.1016/j.humov.2012.06.007⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d2aa069b161c959a09b054862d016d0e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.06.007⟩