Sorry, I don't understand your search. ×
Back to Search Start Over

Cost-Savings to Medicare From Pre-Medicare Colorectal Cancer Screening

Authors :
Florence K. L. Tangka
Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Amy B. Knudsen
Karen M. Kuntz
Simon L. Goede
Ann G. Zauber
Joseph Chin
David Howard
Laura C. Seeff
Public Health
Source :
Medical Care, 53(7), 630-638. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background:Many individuals have not received recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening before they become Medicare eligible at the age of 65. We aimed to estimate the long-term implications of increased CRC screening in the pre-Medicare population (50-64 y) on costs in the pre-Medicare and Medicare populations (65+ y).Methods:We used 2 independently developed microsimulation models [Microsimulation Screening Analysis Colon (MISCAN) and Simulation Model of CRC (SimCRC)] to project CRC screening and treatment costs under 2 scenarios, starting in 2010: current trends (60% of the population up-to-date with screening recommendations) and enhanced participation (70% up-to-date). The population was scaled to the projected US population for each year between 2010 and 2060. Costs per year were derived by age group (50-64 and 65+ y).Results:By 2060, the discounted cumulative total costs in the pre-Medicare population were $35.7 and $28.1 billion higher with enhanced screening participation, than in the current trends scenario ($252.1 billion with MISCAN and $239.5 billion with SimCRC, respectively). Because of CRC treatment savings with enhanced participation, cumulative costs in the Medicare population were $18.3 and $32.7 billion lower (current trends: $423.5 billion with MISCAN and $372.8 billion with SimCRC). Over the 50-year time horizon an estimated 60% (MISCAN) and 89% (SimCRC) of the increased screening costs could be offset by savings in Medicare CRC treatment costs.Conclusion:Increased CRC screening participation in the pre-Medicare population could reduce CRC incidence and mortality, whereas the additional screening costs can be largely offset by long-term Medicare treatment savings.

Details

ISSN :
00257079
Volume :
53
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Medical Care
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d34a277debbc26a78612a9fcca18b035
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000380