Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic Value of Focal Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy

Authors :
Seok-Soo Byun
Sangchul Lee
Sang Eun Lee
Gheeyoung Choe
Jong Jin Oh
Ki Bom Kim
Sung Kyu Hong
Jung Ki Jo
Jin Nyoung Ho
Seong Jin Jeong
Source :
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer. 14:e313-e319
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2016.

Abstract

Background The significance of focal positive margins (FPMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is unclear. Our objective was to investigate the prognostic value of FPMs in patients undergoing RP. Materials and Methods The data were analyzed retrospectively for 1733 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who had undergone RP at our institution from December 2003 to March 2014 without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Positive surgical margins were characterized as FPMs (≤ 3 mm long) or non-FPMs (> 3 mm long). Multivariate analysis of the clinicopathologic factors, including FPMs, was performed with respect to biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival. Results Of the 1733 patients, 1260 (72.7%) had negative margins, 114 (6.6%) had a FPM, 218 (12.6%) had a nonfocal single positive margin (NFSPM), and 141 (8.1%) had nonfocal multiple positive margins (NFMPMs). Of the patients with pathologic T2 prostate cancer, 1065 (84.3%) had negative margins, 62 (4.9%) had 1 FPM, 104 (8.2%) had 1 NFSPM, and 33 (2.6%) had NFMPMs. The 5-year BCR-free survival for patients with negative margins and FPMs was 90% and 83.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a FPM was not a significant prognostic factor for BCR-free survival in all the patients or in the patients with pathologic T2 disease (P = .458 and P = .512, respectively). Conclusions FPMs after RP do not significantly affect BCR-free survival in patients with prostate cancer.

Details

ISSN :
15587673
Volume :
14
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d3c7678552e694517da6b7b4dd68e4c4