Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Corneal Drying on Optical Coherence Tomography

Authors :
Joel S. Schuman
Ellen Hertzmark
Robert J. Noecker
Hiroshi Ishikawa
Daniel Stein
Gadi Wollstein
Source :
Ophthalmology. 113:985-991
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2006.

Abstract

Purpose To determine the effect of corneal drying on the outcome of optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design Cohort study. Participants Seventeen normal participants (mean age, 39±12 years). Methods Subjects underwent a series of peripapillary circular StratusOCT scans (version 3.0; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) in a randomly selected eye. Baseline scan sets were acquired, and thereafter, blinking was prevented by taping the eyelid. Eyelid taping was immediately followed by 6 to 8 serial scan sets, each separated by 20 seconds. After removing the eyelid tape, 3 additional scans were acquired at 1, 2, and 4 minutes of blinking freely. Main Outcome Measures The analyzed outcome measures were scan quality as defined by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and signal strength (SS) provided by the built-in OCT software and mean nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness. Results Significant reductions in SNR, SS, and NFL were noted at each scanning point in the drying phase (for each, P t test) except for NFL thickness measurements acquired at 140 and 160 seconds. The reduction in NFL thickness exceeded the 95% confidence limit of the reported reproducibility error of StratusOCT after 15 seconds of corneal drying. After 1 and 2 minutes of blinking freely, there was still a significant reduction in NFL thickness compared with the baseline value, which was no longer evident at the 4-minute scan. Conclusions Corneal dryness affects OCT scan quality and measured NFL thickness after a short exposure time. It is recommended to instruct those who are scanned to blink frequently or to instill artificial tears.

Details

ISSN :
01616420
Volume :
113
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Ophthalmology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d51aa3bdb751de7f60a2d81990b01721
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.018