Back to Search Start Over

Early hydroxychloroquine but not chloroquine use reduces ICU admission in COVID-19 patients

Authors :
R. M. Brohet
R. E.P. Theunissen
K. Brinkman
A. J.J. Lammers
D.F. Postma
D. W. M. Verhagen
N. Bokhizzou
M. van den Berge
H. Visser
Anton S M Dofferhoff
G. Hermanides
Paul H. P. Groeneveld
Hannelore I. Bax
Robert-Jan Hassing
R. Rood
J. Ellerbroek
C. Koster
R. el Moussaoui
Internal Medicine
Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Source :
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, 283-289. ELSEVIER SCI LTD, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, 283-289, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, pp. 283-289, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, 283-289. Elsevier, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol 101, Iss, Pp 283-289 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Highlights • After the global push for the use of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine there is ongoing discussion about the effectivity of these drugs. • Findings of this observational study provide crucial data on a potential protective effect of Hydroxychloroquine in non-ICU, hospitalized COVID-19 patients. • Early treatment with HCQ on the first day of admission is associated with a reduced risk of 53% in transfer to the ICU for mechanical ventilation. • This protective effect was not observed for Chloroquine, therefore these drugs cannot be regarded as interchangeable.<br />Background The global push for the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) against COVID-19 resulted in an ongoing discussion about the effectivity and toxicity of these drugs. Recent studies report no effect of (H)CQ on 28 day-mortality. We investigated the effect of HCQ and CQ in hospitalized patients on the non-ICU COVID-ward. Methods A nationwide, observational cohort study was performed in The Netherlands. Hospitals were given the opportunity to decide independently on the use of three different COVID-19 treatment strategies: HCQ or CQ, or no treatment. We compared the outcome between these groups. The primary outcomes were 1) death on the COVID-19 ward, and 2) transfer to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Results The analysis contained 1064 patients from 14 hospitals: 566 patients received treatment with either HCQ (n = 189) or CQ (n = 377), and 498 patients received no treatment. In a multivariate propensity matched weighted competing regression analysis, there was no significant effect of (H)CQ on mortality on the COVID-ward. HCQ however was associated with a significant decreased risk of transfer to the ICU (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.27–0.82, p = 0.008), when compared to controls. This effect was not found in the CQ group (HR = 0.80; 95%CI = 0.55–1.15, p = 0.207), and remained significant after competing risk analysis. Conclusion The results of this observational study demonstrate a lack of effect of (H)CQ on non-ICU mortality. However, we show that the use of HCQ - but not CQ - is associated with 53% decreased risk of transfer of COVID-19 patients from the regular ward to the ICU. Recent prospective studies have reported on 28 days all-cause mortality only, therefore additional prospective data on the early effect of HCQ in preventing transfer to the ICU is still needed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
12019712
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, 283-289. ELSEVIER SCI LTD, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, 283-289, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, pp. 283-289, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, 283-289. Elsevier, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol 101, Iss, Pp 283-289 (2020)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d60d6327be59a975b4c15b92cc8aec2d