Back to Search Start Over

Discrepancies Between Pathological Tumor Responses and Estimations of Complete Response by Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Differ by Breast Cancer Subtype

Authors :
Junko Takei
Naoki Hayashi
Koyu Suzuki
Emiko Morishita
Maki Namura
Atsushi Yoshida
Hiroko Tsunoda
Hideko Yamauchi
Hiroshi Yagata
Source :
Clinical Breast Cancer. 18:128-134
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2018.

Abstract

Introduction The influence of breast cancer (BC) subtype in discrepancies between pathologic complete response (pCR) and complete response by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-CR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have not been discussed well. We evaluated the association between BC subtype and pCR or only residual in situ lesion without invasive cancer (pCR/in situ + ) in patients with MRI-CR (positive predictive value [PPV]). Material and Methods From the data of 716 patients with primary BC who were diagnosed with invasive cancer and treated with NAC and then surgery from January 2009 to May 2014 at St. Luke's International Hospital, 180 patients were determined to have MRI-CR by retrospective chart review. BC subtypes at baseline were classified into 6 subtypes, as strong estrogen receptor (ER ++ ), moderately positive ER (ER + ), negative ER (ER − ), and HER2 status expression. Results Three subtypes had PPV (pCR) ≥ 50%: ER − /HER2 + (56.3%, 27/48), ER − /HER2 − (57.6%, 34/59), and ER + /HER2 + (56.2%, 9/16). However, PPV (pCR) for the ER ++ /HER2 − and ER ++ /HER2 + subtypes was ++ /HER2 − subtype, which was significantly low ( P ++ /HER2 − and other subtypes. PPV (pCR/in situ + ) was significantly low at 20.0% in the ER ++ /HER2 − subtype ( P + ) in other subtypes was collectively greater than 60%, and was 91.7% in the ER − /HER2 + subtype. Conclusion We should interpret carefully MRI-CR of NAC to evaluate residual disease for ER ++ /HER2 − BC.

Details

ISSN :
15268209
Volume :
18
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Breast Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d64e22e6f40d1d18b89e58fb11fe18fb
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.07.001