Back to Search Start Over

Vascular resection and reconstruction in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Authors :
Simon H Y Tsang
Tan To Cheung
Albert C. Y. Chan
Ka Wing Ma
Wing Chiu Dai
Wong Hoi She
Chung Mau Lo
Source :
ANZ Journal of Surgery. 90:1653-1659
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aggressive approach of vascular resection plus reconstruction in curative resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) remains controversial. This retrospective study investigated its short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS Data of HC patients from 1989 to 2016 were reviewed. Operated patients were divided into two groups (with and without vascular resection) and compared in terms of perioperative results. Patients who had unresectable HC were also compared with patients who had been operated. RESULTS Ninety patients underwent curative HC resection. They were divided into group A (without aggressive approach, n = 68) and group B (with aggressive approach, n = 22). The groups were comparable in all parameters including rates of overall and major complication and in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day mortality except that group B had more patients with more advanced disease (P = 0.008), more patients with tumour invasion of the vasculature (40.9% versus 7.4%, P = 0.001), and fewer patients with blood transfusion (27.3% versus 52.9%, P = 0.036). The groups had similar disease-free survival (group A: median, 17.9 months, 5 years, 27.4%; group B: median, 11.7 months, 5 years, 14.3%; P = 0.427) and overall survival (group A: median, 22.0 months, 5 years, 26.5%; group B: median, 26.5 months, 5 years, 14.7%; P = 0.90). Two hundred patients with unresectable HC were compared with patients who had received operation and found to have worse survival outcomes (P

Details

ISSN :
14452197 and 14451433
Volume :
90
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d745211af9b34537f3753b119b96f55b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15969