Back to Search Start Over

Aprepitant has Mixed Effects on Nausea and Reduces Other Symptoms in Patients With Gastroparesis and Related Disorders

Authors :
Pankaj J. Pasricha
Katherine P. Yates
Irene Sarosiek
Richard W. McCallum
Thomas L. Abell
Kenneth L. Koch
Linda Anh B. Nguyen
William J. Snape
William L. Hasler
John O. Clarke
Sameer Dhalla
Ellen M. Stein
Linda A. Lee
Laura A. Miriel
Mark L. Van Natta
Madhusudan Grover
Gianrico Farrugia
James Tonascia
Frank A. Hamilton
Henry P. Parkman
Nata DeVole
Karen Earle
Kjersti Kirkeby
Candice Lee
Mimi Lin
Katie Ponting
Gloria Yee
Pankaj Jay Pasricha
Ellen Stein
Yale Kim
Gotzone Garay
Chiara Orlando
Alan Mauer
Perry Orthey
Amiya Palit
Sean Connery
Yvette Gomez
Roberta Romero
Natalia Vega
Ben Alvarado
Lisa Hatter
Ronna Howard
Lindsay Nowotny
William Herman
Andrew Kraftson
Amy E. Rothberg
Sophanara Wootten
Lynn Baxter
Anya Brown
Paula Stuart
Samantha Culler
Cheryl Bernard
Frank Hamilton
Jose Serrano
Stephen James
Rebecca Torrance
Sherry Hall
Patricia Belt
John Dodge
Michele Donithan
Erin Hallinan
Milana Isaacson
Patrick K. May
Laura Miriel
Alice Sternberg
Mark Van Natta
Annette Wagoner
Laura Wilson
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background & Aims There are few effective treatments for nausea and other symptoms in patients with gastroparesis and related syndromes. We performed a randomized trial of the ability of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to reduce symptoms in patients with chronic nausea and vomiting caused by gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like syndrome. Methods We conducted a 4-week multicenter, double-masked trial of 126 patients with at least moderate symptoms of chronic nausea and vomiting of presumed gastric origin for a minimum of 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given oral aprepitant (125 mg/day, n = 63) or placebo (n = 63). The primary outcome from the intention-to-treat analysis was reduction in nausea, defined as a decrease of 25 mm or more, or absolute level below 25 mm, on a daily patient-reported 0-to-100 visual analog scale (VAS) of nausea severity. We calculated relative risks of nausea improvement using stratified Cochran-Mental-Haenszel analysis. Results Aprepitant did not reduce symptoms of nausea, based on the primary outcome measure (46% reduction in the VAS score in the aprepitant group vs 40% reduction in the placebo group; relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8–1.7) ( P = .43). However, patients in the aprepitant group had significant changes in secondary outcomes such as reduction in symptom severity (measured by the 0–5 Gastroparesis Clinical Symptom Index) for nausea (1.8 vs 1.0; P = .005), vomiting (1.6 vs 0.5; P = .001), and overall symptoms (1.3 vs 0.7; P = .001). Adverse events, predominantly mild or moderate in severity grade, were more common in aprepitant (22 of 63 patients, 35% vs 11 of 63, 17% in the placebo group) ( P = .04). Conclusions In a randomized trial of patients with chronic nausea and vomiting caused by gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like syndrome, aprepitant did not reduce the severity of nausea when reduction in VAS score was used as the primary outcome. However, aprepitant had varying effects on secondary outcomes of symptom improvement. These findings support the need to identify appropriate patient outcomes for trials of therapies for gastroparesis, including potential additional trials for aprepitant. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01149369.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01149369
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d75c1f32d173f24ef21d574156fb3366