Back to Search Start Over

Sunitinib Alone or After Nephrectomy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is There Still a Role for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy?

Authors :
Bernard Escudier
Laurent Guy
Arnaud Mejean
Thierry Lebret
Brigitte Laguerre
Laurence Albiges
Jean-Marc Tréluyer
Marine Gross-Goupil
Eric Lechevallier
Claude Linassier
Alain Ravaud
Karim Bensalah
Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin
Marc-Olivier Timsit
Stéphane Oudard
Lionnel Geoffrois
Frederic Rolland
Sandra Colas
Christine Chevreau
Simon Thezenas
Luc Cormier
Jean-Christophe Bernhard
Hervé Lang
Gwenaelle Gravis
Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques (IMoST)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)
CHU Gabriel Montpied [Clermont-Ferrand]
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Source :
European Urology, European Urology, 2021, 80 (4), pp.417-424. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.009⟩, European Urology, Elsevier, 2021, 80 (4), pp.417-424. ⟨10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.009⟩
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background The CARMENA trial in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) demonstrated that treatment with sunitinib alone was noninferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by sunitinib (nephrectomy⬜sunitinib). Objective The objective of this study was to provide updated overall survival (OS) outcomes of CARMENA and assess whether some subgroups may still benefit from upfront CN. Design, setting, and participants CARMENA was a phase III trial in 450 patients with mRCC enrolled from 2009 to 2017. Intervention Patients in the intention-to-treat population received nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (standard of care [SOC]; n = 226) or sunitinib alone (n = 224). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary endpoint was OS, assessed using an updated data cut-off (October 2018; median OS event-free follow-up, 36.6 mo). Patients were reclassified by risk using International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. Results and limitations Sunitinib alone was noninferior to nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.79⬜1.19; p = 0.8) and demonstrated longer median OS (19.8 mo vs 15.6 mo, respectively). For patients with two or more IMDC risk factors, OS was significantly longer with sunitinib alone than with nephrectomy⬜sunitinib (31.2 mo vs 17.6 mo, respectively; HR, 0.65; p = 0.03). For patients with one IMDC risk factor, OS was longer for nephrectomy⬜sunitinib versus sunitinib alone although not significantly (31.4 mo vs 25.2 mo; HR, 1.30; p = 0.2). The post hoc nature of the subgroup analyses may limit their interpretation. Conclusions Sunitinib alone was noninferior compared with nephrectomy⬜sunitinib, suggesting that CN should not be considered SOC in patients with mRCC requiring systemic treatment. Certain subgroups, including patients with one IMDC risk factor, may still benefit from upfront CN. Patient summary We assessed the survival of patients with metastatic kidney cancer in a clinical trial. Patients treated with sunitinib on its own had the same survival as patients who had surgery before sunitinib treatment. We conclude that surgery may not be necessary for some patients with metastatic kidney cancer.

Details

ISSN :
03022838 and 1421993X
Volume :
80
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d7f88a20ce987f907ceb4e04c95c57c8