Back to Search Start Over

Labial soft tissue contour dynamics following immediate implants and immediate provisionalization of single maxillary incisors: A 1-year prospective study

Authors :
Jiehua Tian
Xi Jiang
Yijiao Zhao
Ye Lin
Donghao Wei
Ping Di
Source :
Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 21(3)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

BACKGROUND Soft tissue dynamics in the esthetic zone are gaining increasing attention in recent years. Emerging intraoral scanning technology allows easier capture of soft tissue contours. PURPOSE To quantitatively assess the time-dependent contour alterations of labial soft tissue following single immediate implants and immediate provisionalization (IIPP) in maxillary incisors via intraoral scanning. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective cohort study. Thirty eligible consecutive patients were included and received immediate replacement of a failure maxillary single incisor. A screw-retained immediate restoration was delivered for each patient. Subsequently, the anterior maxillary region was scanned by an intraoral scanning system at four time points: preoperation (baseline, BL), 3 months (3 m), 6 months (6 m), and 12 months (12 m). The Standard Tessellation Language files were exported to a dedicated software and superimposed for visual analysis. At 3, 6, and 12 months, the mid-facial mucosa level (ML) was assessed, and the precise three-dimensional (3D) configuration of the altered volume was calculated and reconstructed for visual analysis. Furthermore, quantitative analysis of the reconstructed morphology was performed using the following parameters: mean change in thickness (△d), mesio-distal width (w), coronal-apical height (h), and horizontal and vertical position of the thickest point represented by coordinates (x, z). RESULT Twenty-seven of thirty enrolled patients were finally available for analysis at the 1-year follow-up. In general, the frontal view of the reconstructed volume exhibited a crescent shape. The mid-facial ML change at 3, 6, and 12 months was -0.05 ± 0.36 mm, -0.03 ± 0.32 mm, and -0.24 ± 0.37 mm, respectively (P = .012). The mean change in thickness at 3 months (△d3m ), 6 months (△d6m ), and 12 months (△d12m ) was 0.50 ± 0.19 mm, 0.59 ± 0.21 mm, and 0.62 ± 0.22 mm, respectively (P

Details

ISSN :
17088208
Volume :
21
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical implant dentistry and related research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d802608cb2c7b298b282eb194165fea6