Back to Search Start Over

Marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago

Authors :
Glenn T. Crossin
Michael Power
Colin Buhariwalla
Jan Grimsrud Davidsen
Xavier Bordeleau
Frederick G. Whoriskey
Sindre Håvarstein Eldøy
Philippe Gaudin
NTNU University Museum [Trondheim]
Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim] (NTNU)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)-Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
Department of Biology (Dalhousie University)
Dalhousie University [Halifax]
Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Maurice Lamontagne Institute
Ocean Tracking network
Dalhousie University
University of Waterloo [Waterloo]
Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture
Ecologie Comportementale et Biologie des Populations de Poissons (ECOBIOP)
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour (UPPA)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
French Polar Institute (IPEV, Institut Polaire Paul-Emile Victor) / SALMEVOL Program
LTSER (Zone Atelier Antarctique et Terres Australes)
NTNU University Museum
Dalhousie University's Ocean Tracking Network
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
Source :
Scientific Reports, Scientific Reports, Nature Publishing Group, 2021, 11 (1), ⟨10.1038/s41598-021-91405-x⟩, Scientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2021.

Abstract

In 1954, brown trout were introduced to the Kerguelen archipelago (49°S, 70°E), a pristine, sub-Antarctic environment previously devoid of native freshwater fishes. Trout began spreading rapidly via coastal waters to colonize adjacent watersheds, however, recent and unexpectedly the spread has slowed. To better understand the ecology of the brown trout here, and why their expansion has slowed, we documented the marine habitat use, foraging ecology, and environmental conditions experienced over one year by 50 acoustically tagged individuals at the colonization front. Trout mainly utilized the marine habitat proximate to their tagging site, ranging no further than 7 km and not entering any uncolonized watersheds. Nutritional indicators showed that trout were in good condition at the time of tagging. Stomach contents and isotope signatures in muscle of additional trout revealed a diet of amphipods (68%), fish (23%), isopods (6%), and zooplankton (6%). The small migration distances observed, presence of suitable habitat, and rich local foraging opportunities suggest that trout can achieve their resource needs close to their home rivers. This may explain why the expansion of brown trout at Kerguelen has slowed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20452322
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scientific Reports, Scientific Reports, Nature Publishing Group, 2021, 11 (1), ⟨10.1038/s41598-021-91405-x⟩, Scientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d9edc566f2c29e4fb339b88400f504ac