Back to Search
Start Over
Considering the Test Performance for Three Class Data Using Linear Discriminant Analysis: A Case Study
- Source :
- Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 32:713-723
- Publication Year :
- 2004
- Publisher :
- SAGE Publications, 2004.
-
Abstract
- The results of a European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods validation study on the embryonic stem (ES) cell test were used as an example for the test performance for “three-class” data using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Applying LDA, a biostatistical prediction model was developed to assign test chemicals to three classes of embryotoxicity. Three endpoint values were identified to classify the embryotoxic potential of chemicals: a) the inhibition of differentiation of ES cells into cardiomyocytes (ID50), b) the decrease of viability of adult 3T3 cells (IC503T3), and c) the decrease of viability of ES cells (IC50D3) in an MTT cytotoxicity test. It could be demonstrated that an objective statistical method was required in order to minimise the probability of misclassification. The management team of the validation study defined performance criteria, taking into consideration the hit rate for three classes obtained just by chance. An additional purpose of the study reported here was to calculate a hypothetical prevalence and evaluate its influence on the classification results.
- Subjects :
- Alternative methods
Validation study
Cytotoxicity test
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Discriminant Analysis
Cell Differentiation
3T3 Cells
General Medicine
Animal Testing Alternatives
Toxicology
Linear discriminant analysis
Class (biology)
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Mice
Medical Laboratory Technology
Statistics
Hit rate
Animals
Test performance
Embryonic Stem Cells
Mathematics
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 26323559 and 02611929
- Volume :
- 32
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....da84f8b9e54f1646e554129af11a5da5
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026119290403201s119