Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of two distinct web-based education tools for bedside nurses on medication administration practice for venous thromboembolism prevention: A randomized clinical trial

Authors :
Dauryne L. Shaffer
Brandyn D. Lau
Michael B. Streiff
Deborah B. Hobson
Jonathan Aboagye
Elizabeth A. Sugar
Norma E. Farrow
Joseph K. Canner
Peggy S. Kraus
Victor O. Popoola
Peter J. Pronovost
Elliott R. Haut
Jiangxia Wang
Gayane Yenokyan
David Bongiovanni
Hasan M Shihab
Source :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 8, p e0181664 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of preventable harm in hospitalized patients. While numerous successful interventions have been implemented to improve prescription of VTE prophylaxis, a substantial proportion of doses of prescribed preventive medications are not administered to hospitalized patients. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse education on medication administration practice. Methods This was a double-blinded, cluster randomized trial in 21 medical or surgical floors of 933 nurses at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, an academic medical center, from April 1, 2014 –March 31, 2015. Nurses were cluster-randomized by hospital floor to receive either a linear static education (Static) module with voiceover or an interactive learner-centric dynamic scenario-based education (Dynamic) module. The primary and secondary outcomes were non-administration of prescribed VTE prophylaxis medication and nurse-reported satisfaction with education modules, respectively. Results Overall, non-administration improved significantly following education (12.4% vs. 11.1%, conditional OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80–0.95, p = 0.002) achieving our primary objective. The reduction in non-administration was greater for those randomized to the Dynamic arm (10.8% vs. 9.2%, conditional OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72–0.95) versus the Static arm (14.5% vs. 13.5%, conditional OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81–1.03), although the difference between arms was not statistically significant (p = 0.26). Satisfaction scores were significantly higher (p

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
12
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PloS one
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....dafb1476faf25d8831c3ae95f7e4d6f5