Back to Search Start Over

Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR)

Authors :
Thomas J. Ford
Stuart Watkins
Mitchell Lindsay
Richard Good
John D. McClure
Patrick O’Boyle
Colin Berry
Keith Robertson
Damien Collison
Paul Rocchiccioli
Samuel Copt
Adnan Khan
Peter McCartney
Hany Eteiba
Aadil Shaukat
Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-Rahman
Matthaios Didagelos
Stuart Hood
Margaret McEntegart
Keith G. Oldroyd
Andrew Davie
Richard Brogan
Robert McDade
Source :
European heart journal. 42(45)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aims A fractional flow reserve (FFR) value ≥0.90 after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a reduced risk of adverse cardiovascular events. TARGET-FFR is an investigator-initiated, single-centre, randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a post-PCI FFR-guided optimization strategy vs. standard coronary angiography in achieving final post-PCI FFR values ≥0.90. Methods and results After angiographically guided PCI, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a physiology-guided incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) or a blinded coronary physiology assessment (control group). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a final post-PCI FFR ≥0.90. Final FFR ≤0.80 was a prioritized secondary outcome. A total of 260 patients were randomized (131 to PIOS, 129 to control) and 68.1% of patients had an initial post-PCI FFR Conclusion Over two-thirds of patients had a physiologically suboptimal result after angiography-guided PCI. An FFR-guided optimization strategy did not significantly increase the proportion of patients with a final FFR ≥0.90, but did reduce the proportion of patients with a final FFR ≤0.80.

Details

ISSN :
15229645 and 0195668X
Volume :
42
Issue :
45
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European heart journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....dba69bce877fbe6aa438095ca3c02f5b