Back to Search Start Over

A multicentre, randomised trial comparing schedules of G-CSF (filgrastim) administration for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer

Authors :
M. Bahl
Demetrios Simos
Ricardo Fernandes
Jacques Raphael
Nadia Califaretti
Brian Hutton
L. Zibdawi
Carol Stober
Mark Clemons
Ranjeeta Mallick
Deanna Saunders
Andrew Robinson
Lacey D. Pitre
Mohamed F.K. Ibrahim
John Hilton
Dean Fergusson
Olexiy Aseyev
Arif Awan
Lisa Vandermeer
Gregory R. Pond
M. Mates
Source :
Annals of Oncology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Background The optimal duration of filgrastim as primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis in early breast cancer patients is unknown, with 5, 7 or 10 days being commonly prescribed. This trial evaluates whether 5 days of filgrastim was non-inferior to 7/10 days. Patients and methods In this randomised, open-label trial, early breast cancer patients who were to receive filgrastim as primary FN prophylaxis were randomly allocated to 5 versus 7 versus 10 days of filgrastim for all chemotherapy cycles. A protocol amendment in November 2017 allowed subsequent patients (N = 324) to be randomised to either 5 or 7/10 days. The primary outcome was a composite of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisations. Secondary outcomes included chemotherapy dose reductions, delays and discontinuations. Analyses were carried out by per protocol (primary) and intention-to-treat, and the non-inferiority margin was set at 3% for the risk of having FN and/or hospitalisation per cycle of chemotherapy. Results Patients (N = 466) were randomised to receive 5 (184, 39.5%), or 7/10 (282, 60.5%) days of filgrastim. In our primary analysis, the difference in risk of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisation per cycle was −1.52% [95% confidence interval (CI): −3.22% to 0.19%] suggesting non-inferiority of a 5-day filgrastim schedule compared with 7/10-days. The difference in events per cycle for FN was 0.11% (95% CI: −1.05 to 1.27) while for treatment-related hospitalisations it was −1.68% (95% CI: −2.73% to −0.63%). The overall proportions of patients having at least one occurrence of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisation were 11.8% and 14.96% for the 5- and 7/10-day groups, respectively (risk difference: −3.17%, 95% CI: −9.51% to 3.18%). Conclusion Five days of filgrastim was non-inferior to 7/10 days. Given the cost and toxicity of this agent, 5 days should be considered standard of care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02428114 and NCT02816164.

Details

ISSN :
09237534
Volume :
31
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....dca646365c81b5eedde70aeecc5fb69b