Back to Search Start Over

A comparison of etanercept vs. infliximab for the treatment of post-arrest myocardial dysfunction in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation

Authors :
John P. Rosborough
James T. Niemann
Scott T. Youngquist
Atman P. Shah
Joseph L. Thomas
Source :
Resuscitation. 84:999-1003
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2013.

Abstract

Aims To compare the effects of two TNF-α antagonists, etanercept and infliximab, on post-cardiac arrest hemodynamics and global left ventricular function (LV) in a swine model following ventricular fibrillation (VF). Methods Domestic swine ( n = 30) were placed under general anesthesia and instrumented before VF was induced electrically. After 7 min of VF, standard ACLS resuscitation was performed. Animals achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were randomized to immediately receive infliximab (5 mg/kg, n = 10) or etanercept (0.3 mg/kg [4 mg/m 2 ], n = 10) or vehicle (250 mL normal saline [NS], n = 10) and LV function and hemodynamics were monitored for 3 h. Results Following ROSC, mean arterial pressure (MAP), stroke work (SW), and LV dP / dt fell from pre-arrest values in all groups. However, at the 30 min nadir, infliximab-treated animals had higher MAP than either the NS group (difference 14.4 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2–24.7) or the etanercept group (19.2 mm Hg, 95% CI 9.0–29.5), higher SW than the NS group (10.3 gm-m, 95% CI 5.1–15.5) or the etanercept group (8.9 gm-m, 95% CI 4.0–14.4) and greater LV dP / dt than the NS group (282.9 mm Hg/s, 95% CI 169.6–386.1 higher with infliximab) or the etanercep group (228.9 mm Hg/s, 95% CI 115.6–342.2 higher with infliximab). Conclusions Only infliximab demonstrated a beneficial effect on post cardiac arrest hemodynamics and LV function in this swine model. Etanercept was no better in this regard than saline.

Details

ISSN :
03009572
Volume :
84
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Resuscitation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....dcb1dcf487d4c1dc35a961d8e7662295
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.028