Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a standardised intracameral combination of mydriatics and anaesthetics for cataract surgery

Authors :
Joseph Colin
Oliver Findl
Dahbia Hartani
Sihem Lazreg
Marie-José Tassignon
Jorge L. Alió
Conceição Lobo
François Malecaze
Marc Labetoulle
Anders Behndig
Béatrice Cochener
AP-HP Hôpital Bicêtre (Le Kremlin-Bicêtre)
Virulence et Latence des Herpesvirus (HERPES)
Département Virologie (Dpt Viro)
Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Medizinische Universität Wien = Medical University of Vienna
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)
Vissum-Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante
Service d'ophtalmologie [Brest]
Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (CHRU Brest)
Centre d'ophtalmologie
CHU Mustapha
Hôpital Pellegrin Tripode
Antwerp University Hospital [Edegem] (UZA)
Ume University Hospital
Umea University Hospital
Virulence et Latence des Herpesvirus ( HERPES )
Département Virologie ( Dpt Viro )
Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule ( I2BC )
Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ) -Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives ( CEA ) -Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ) -Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives ( CEA ) -Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule ( I2BC )
Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ) -Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives ( CEA ) -Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ) -Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives ( CEA ) -Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS )
Moorfields Eye Hospital, London and Dept. of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
Hôpital Purpan [Toulouse]
Université de Brest ( UBO ) -Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest ( CHRU Brest )
Antwerp University Hospital [Edegem]
CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]
Intracameral Mydrane Study 2 Grp
Source :
British Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, ⟨10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307587⟩, British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMJ Publishing Group, 2015, 〈10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307587〉, The British Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMJ Publishing Group, 2015, ⟨10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307587⟩, British journal of ophthalmology
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of intracameral (IC) administration at the beginning of cataract surgery, of Mydrane, a standardised ophthalmic combination of tropicamide 0.02%, phenylephrine 0.31% and lidocaine 1%, to a standard topical regimen. METHODS: In this international phase III, prospective, randomised study, the selected eye of 555 patients undergoing phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation received 200 μL of Mydrane (Mydrane group) just after the first incision or a topical regimen of one drop each of tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10% repeated three times (reference group). The primary efficacy variable was achievement of capsulorhexis without additional mydriatics. The non-inferiority of Mydrane to the topical regimen was tested. The main outcome measures were pupil size, patient perception of ocular discomfort and safety. RESULTS: Capsulorhexis without additional mydriatics was performed in 98.9% of patients and 94.7% in the Mydrane and reference groups, respectively. Both groups achieved adequate mydriasis (>7 mm) during capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification and IOL insertion. IOL insertion was classified as 'routine' in a statistically greater number of eyes in the Mydrane group compared with the reference group (p=0.047). Patients in the Mydrane group reported statistically greater comfort than the reference group before IOL insertion (p=0.034). Safety data were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mydrane is an effective and safe alternative to standard eye drops for initiating and maintaining intraoperative mydriasis and analgesia. Patients who received IC Mydrane were significantly more comfortable before IOL insertion than the reference group. Surgeons found IOL insertion less technically challenging with IC Mydrane. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02101359; Results. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00071161 and 14682079
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, ⟨10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307587⟩, British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMJ Publishing Group, 2015, 〈10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307587〉, The British Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMJ Publishing Group, 2015, ⟨10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307587⟩, British journal of ophthalmology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....de11fbc09002f3fd560115a5da9586b0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307587⟩