Back to Search Start Over

Analgetic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. A controlled clinical comparison of morphine, nicomorphine and pethidine

Authors :
J R Nielsen
B L Nielsen
Knud Erik Pedersen
Lars F. Gram
Torben Johansen
C G Dahlstrøm
Bo J. M. Secher
Source :
Nielsen, J R, Pedersen, K E, Dahlstrøm, C G, Nielsen, B L, Secher, B J M, Johansen, T & Gram, L F 1984, ' Analgetic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. A controlled clinical comparison of morphine, nicomorphine and pethidine ', Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 215, no. 4, pp. 349-54 .
Publication Year :
1984

Abstract

In a randomized double-blind study with flexible dosage, morphine, nicomorphine and pethidine were compared with regard to analgetic effect, dose requirements, dose intervals and adverse reactions. A total of 275 patients were included, and 28 patients were excluded due to adverse reactions (n = 16) and for practical reasons, etc. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was diagnosed in about 60% of the patients, and about 30% had ischemic heart disease without AMI. All three analgesics provided equally efficient pain relief in relative doses of morphine 10, nicomorphine 10 and pethidine 75 mg/ml. Severe adverse reactions were few (allergy 3 cases, respiratory insufficiency 4, severe bradycardia 4), whereas nausea was recorded in 20-30%, vomiting in 5-15% and dizziness in 10-30% of the patients, with no difference between the three drugs. Significant blood pressure drop (greater than 30 mmHg) was seen in 3-8% of the patients, with no significant differences between the drugs.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Nielsen, J R, Pedersen, K E, Dahlstrøm, C G, Nielsen, B L, Secher, B J M, Johansen, T & Gram, L F 1984, ' Analgetic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. A controlled clinical comparison of morphine, nicomorphine and pethidine ', Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 215, no. 4, pp. 349-54 .
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....de3d7286e92e450ef650578ea6628666