Back to Search Start Over

Virtual collaboration: effect of spatial configuration on spatial statements production

Authors :
Franck Mars
Isabelle Milleville-Pennel
François Guillaume
Lauriane Pouliquen-Lardy
Institut de Recherche Technologique Jules Verne [Bouguenais] (IRT Jules Verne)
IRT Jules Vernes
Institut de Recherche en Communications et en Cybernétique de Nantes (IRCCyN)
Mines Nantes (Mines Nantes)-École Centrale de Nantes (ECN)-Ecole Polytechnique de l'Université de Nantes (EPUN)
Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Nantes (UN)-PRES Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (UNAM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
DIST Délégation Information Scientifique et Technique (DV-IST)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
IRT Jules Verne
PIVIPP project
Mines Nantes (Mines Nantes)-École Centrale de Nantes (ECN)-Ecole Polytechnique de l'Université de Nantes (Polytech Nantes)
Source :
Cognitive Processing, Cognitive Processing, Springer Verlag, 2015, 16 (S1), pp.337-342. ⟨10.1007/s10339-015-0672-2⟩
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

International audience; Background: When guiding a remote collaborator in a virtual environment, people often take an addressee-perspective, which may have a high cognitive cost. In order to improve collaborative virtual environments, a better understanding of how operators share spatial information is needed.Aims: This work aimed to study the cognitive workload linked to spatial statements production in situations in which the relative positions of speaker, addressee and target were varied.Method: Twenty-two participants were asked to give - in one go - instructions to a virtual collaborator on how to find a target in a 3D environment. The scene showed an avatar in the center of eight tables. Sixty-four configurations of avatar orientation (eight possibilities) and target location (on the eight tables) were tested. We measured the delay in starting the instruction once the target appeared, the instruction duration, and the subjective evaluation of mental demand. Each instruction was classified according to the spatial reference frame used.Results: The delay was influenced by the processing of spatial information in ego-centered and addressee-centered reference frames. All subsequent measures were determined by mental transformations in addressee-centered coordinates. One condition in particular, when the target was situated diagonally behind the addressee, gave rise to a higher mental demand for the speaker, which points to the investment made by the speaker in achieving the least collaborative effort.Conclusions: Further work should seek to develop efficient tools to facilitate spatial communication in situations that induce the most mental workload.

Details

ISSN :
16124790 and 16124782
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cognitive processing
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e00502a48d703d3d5d075f70fc461695
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0672-2⟩