Back to Search Start Over

The Delphi and GRADE methodology used in the PSOGI 2018 consensus statement on Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Authors :
Rosella Bertulli
Ingvar Syk
Julien Péron
Marc Pocard
Pierre Dubé
M. Deraco
Eun Jung Park
Kuno Lehmann
Mohammad Alyami
Almog Ben-Yaacov
Marcos Lyra
Vahan Kepenekian
Selman Sökmen
Jason M. Foster
Yang Yu
Filippo Pietrantonio
B. J. Moran
Stein Gunnar Larsen
Brian W. Loggie
Peter J. Hewett
Marianne Sinn
Claudio Almeida Quadros
Martin Hübner
Yutaka Yonemura
NielsF.M. Kok
S. Kusamura
Lucas Sideris
Malcom S. Wilson
Luis Gonzales-Bayon
Paul H. Sugarbaker
Pedro Barrios-Sanchez
Jacobus W. A. Burger
John Spiliotis
Delia Cortes-Guiral
Pankaj K. Pande
Maciej S. Nowacki
Olivier Glehen
Armando Sardi
Mao-Chih Hsieh
Robin J. Lurvink
Aviram Nissan
Yan Li
Wim Ceelen
Craig Lynch
MelissaC.C. Teo
Sanket Mehta
Sanjeev Dayal
Peter C. Thuss-Patience
Jan Braess
Aditi Bhatt
Firoz Rajan
Victor J. Verwaal
Michele De Simone
Thierry André
Laurent Villeneuve
Beate Rau
A.A.K. Tentes
Mario Valle
Geert-Jan Creemers
K. Van der Speeten
Jasen Ly
Kiran K. Turaga
Maria Di Bartolomeo
P.A. Cascales-Campos
Marc A. Reymond
Joel M. Baumgartner
Faheez Mohamed
S.P. Somashekhar
David L. Morris
Peter H Cashin
Pompiliu Piso
Roman Yarema
Diane Goéré
Kjersti Flatmark
K. Govaerts
David J. Perry
P Tom Cecil
I. H. J. T. de Hingh
Nicholas Lutton
Alexander G. Heriot
Source :
Lurvink, R J, Villeneuve, L, Govaerts, K, de Hingh, I H J T, Moran, B J, Deraco, M, Van der Speeten, K, Glehen, O, Kepenekian, V, Kusamura, S & List of PSOGI collaborators 2021, ' The Delphi and GRADE methodology used in the PSOGI 2018 consensus statement on Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Peritoneal Mesothelioma ', European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 4-10 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.012, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP) and Peritoneal Mesothelioma (PM) are both rare peritoneal malignancies. Currently, affected patients may be treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy offering long-term survival or even cure in selected patients. However, many issues regarding the optimal treatment strategy are currently under debate. To aid physicians involved in the treatment of these patients in clinical decision making, the PSOGI executive committee proposed to create a consensus statement on PMP and PM. This manuscript describes the methodology of the consensus process. The Delphi technique is a reliable method for attaining consensus on a topic that lacks scientific evidence through multiple voting rounds which feeds back responses to the participants in between rounds. The GRADE system provides a structured framework for presenting and grading the available evidence. Separate questionnaires were created for PMP and PM and sent during two voting rounds to 80 and 38 experts, respectively. A consensus threshold of 51.0% was chosen. After the second round, consensus was reached on 92.9%-100.0% of the questions. The results were presented and discussed in the plenary session at the PSOGI 2018 international meeting in Paris. A third round for the remaining issues is currently in progress. In conclusion, using the Delphi technique and GRADE methodology, consensus was reached in many issues regarding the treatment of PM and PMP amongst an international panel of experts. The main results will be published in the near future.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Lurvink, R J, Villeneuve, L, Govaerts, K, de Hingh, I H J T, Moran, B J, Deraco, M, Van der Speeten, K, Glehen, O, Kepenekian, V, Kusamura, S & List of PSOGI collaborators 2021, ' The Delphi and GRADE methodology used in the PSOGI 2018 consensus statement on Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Peritoneal Mesothelioma ', European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 4-10 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.012, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e026f5aac72ab2ed519822fc5ea7c1aa
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.012