Back to Search Start Over

Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial

Authors :
Jeana Frost
Monica Mars
Suzanne Higgs
Sander Hermsen
Roel C.J. Hermans
Health promotion
RS: NUTRIM - R1 - Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular health
Source :
The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1):90. BioMed Central Ltd, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2019), The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 16 (2019) 1, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 16(1)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background Eating rate is a basic determinant of appetite regulation: people who eat more slowly feel sated earlier and eat less. A high eating rate contributes to overeating and potentially to weight gain. Previous studies showed that an augmented fork that delivers real-time feedback on eating rate is a potentially effective intervention to decrease eating rate in naturalistic settings. This study assessed the impact of using the augmented fork during a 15-week period on eating rate and body weight. Methods In a parallel randomized controlled trial, 141 participants with overweight (age: 49.2 ± 12.3 y; BMI: 31.5 ± 4.48 kg/m2) were randomized to intervention groups (VFC, n = 51 or VFC+, n = 44) or control group (NFC, n = 46). First, we measured bite rate and success ratio on five consecutive days with the augmented fork without feedback (T1). The intervention groups (VFC, VFC+) then used the same fork, but now received vibrotactile feedback when they ate more than one bite per 10 s. Participants in VFC+ had additional access to a web portal with visual feedback. In the control group (NFC), participants ate with the fork without either feedback. The intervention period lasted four weeks, followed by a week of measurements only (T2) and another measurement week after eight weeks (T3). Body weight was assessed at T1, T2, and T3. Results Participants in VFC and VFC+ had a lower bite rate (p p p Conclusions The findings of this study indicate that an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback is a viable tool to reduce eating rate in naturalistic settings. Further investigation may confirm that the augmented fork could support long-term weight loss strategies. Trial registration The research reported in this manuscript was registered on 4 November 2015 in the Netherlands Trial Register with number NL5432 (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5432).

Details

ISSN :
14795868
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e03c0ef0d9b3641553bc6f136c516169