Back to Search
Start Over
An Automated Speech-in-Noise Test for Remote Testing: Development and Preliminary Evaluation
- Source :
- American journal of audiology (Online) 29 (2020): 564–576. doi:10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00071, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Paglialonga A., Polo E.M., Zanet M., Rocco G., van Waterschoot T., Barbieri R./titolo:An automated speech-in-noise test for remote testing: development and preliminary evaluation/doi:10.1044%2F2020_AJA-19-00071/rivista:American journal of audiology (Online)/anno:2020/pagina_da:564/pagina_a:576/intervallo_pagine:564–576/volume:29, American Journal of Audiology
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Purpose The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel, automated speech-in-noise test viable for widespread in situ and remote screening. Method Vowel–consonant–vowel sounds in a multiple-choice consonant discrimination task were used. Recordings from a professional male native English speaker were used. A novel adaptive staircase procedure was developed, based on the estimated intelligibility of stimuli rather than on theoretical binomial models. Test performance was assessed in a population of 26 young adults (YAs) with normal hearing and in 72 unscreened adults (UAs), including native and nonnative English listeners. Results The proposed test provided accurate estimates of the speech recognition threshold (SRT) compared to a conventional adaptive procedure. Consistent outcomes were observed in YAs in test/retest and in controlled/uncontrolled conditions and in UAs in native and nonnative listeners. The SRT increased with increasing age, hearing loss, and self-reported hearing handicap in UAs. Test duration was similar in YAs and UAs irrespective of age and hearing loss. The test–retest repeatability of SRTs was high (Pearson correlation coefficient = .84), and the pass/fail outcomes of the test were reliable in repeated measures (Cohen's κ = .8). The test was accurate in identifying ears with pure-tone thresholds > 25 dB HL (accuracy = 0.82). Conclusion This study demonstrated the viability of the proposed test in subjects of varying language in terms of accuracy, reliability, and short test time. Further research is needed to validate the test in a larger population across a wider range of languages and hearing loss and to identify optimal classification criteria for screening purposes.
- Subjects :
- Male
Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology
Computer science
Audiology
Intelligibility (communication)
Automation
LISTENERS
0302 clinical medicine
adults
RECEPTION
speech-in-noise
speech reception threshold
vowel-consonant-vowel
ABILITIES
early detection
030223 otorhinolaryngology
10. No inequality
Aged, 80 and over
SCREENING-TESTS
education.field_of_study
Speech Reception Threshold Test
Repeatability
Middle Aged
Telemedicine
Speech Perception
symbols
Female
medicine.symptom
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Adult
Consonant
medicine.medical_specialty
INDUCED HEARING-LOSS
Hearing loss
Population
elderly
speech in noise test
Speech in noise
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Speech and Hearing
symbols.namesake
otorhinolaryngologic diseases
audiology
medicine
Humans
education
Aged
hearing loss
Science & Technology
screening
RECOGNITION
speech recognition
Reproducibility of Results
Repeated measures design
ADULTS
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient
Otorhinolaryngology
hearing
HEALTH-CARE
INTELLIGIBILITY
Noise
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
hearing screening
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15589137 and 10590889
- Volume :
- 29
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- American Journal of Audiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e1287d9d4bf15eddd03c8e609e2c7990