Back to Search Start Over

An Automated Speech-in-Noise Test for Remote Testing: Development and Preliminary Evaluation

Authors :
Toon van Waterschoot
Alessia Paglialonga
Riccardo Barbieri
Giulia Rocco
Marco Zanet
Edoardo Maria Polo
Source :
American journal of audiology (Online) 29 (2020): 564–576. doi:10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00071, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Paglialonga A., Polo E.M., Zanet M., Rocco G., van Waterschoot T., Barbieri R./titolo:An automated speech-in-noise test for remote testing: development and preliminary evaluation/doi:10.1044%2F2020_AJA-19-00071/rivista:American journal of audiology (Online)/anno:2020/pagina_da:564/pagina_a:576/intervallo_pagine:564–576/volume:29, American Journal of Audiology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Speech Language Hearing Association, 2020.

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel, automated speech-in-noise test viable for widespread in situ and remote screening. Method Vowel–consonant–vowel sounds in a multiple-choice consonant discrimination task were used. Recordings from a professional male native English speaker were used. A novel adaptive staircase procedure was developed, based on the estimated intelligibility of stimuli rather than on theoretical binomial models. Test performance was assessed in a population of 26 young adults (YAs) with normal hearing and in 72 unscreened adults (UAs), including native and nonnative English listeners. Results The proposed test provided accurate estimates of the speech recognition threshold (SRT) compared to a conventional adaptive procedure. Consistent outcomes were observed in YAs in test/retest and in controlled/uncontrolled conditions and in UAs in native and nonnative listeners. The SRT increased with increasing age, hearing loss, and self-reported hearing handicap in UAs. Test duration was similar in YAs and UAs irrespective of age and hearing loss. The test–retest repeatability of SRTs was high (Pearson correlation coefficient = .84), and the pass/fail outcomes of the test were reliable in repeated measures (Cohen's κ = .8). The test was accurate in identifying ears with pure-tone thresholds > 25 dB HL (accuracy = 0.82). Conclusion This study demonstrated the viability of the proposed test in subjects of varying language in terms of accuracy, reliability, and short test time. Further research is needed to validate the test in a larger population across a wider range of languages and hearing loss and to identify optimal classification criteria for screening purposes.

Details

ISSN :
15589137 and 10590889
Volume :
29
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Audiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e1287d9d4bf15eddd03c8e609e2c7990