Back to Search Start Over

Accounting for pharmacokinetic differences in dual-tracer receptor density imaging

Authors :
Tayyaba Hasan
Mamadou Diop
Kenneth M. Tichauer
Kimberley S. Samkoe
Brian W. Pogue
K. St. Lawrence
Jonathan T. Elliott
Source :
Physics in Medicine and Biology. 59:2341-2351
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
IOP Publishing, 2014.

Abstract

Dual-tracer molecular imaging is a powerful approach to quantify receptor expression in a wide range of tissues by using an untargeted tracer to account for any nonspecific uptake of a molecular-targeted tracer. This approach has previously required the pharmacokinetics of the receptor-targeted and untargeted tracers to be identical, requiring careful selection of an ideal untargeted tracer for any given targeted tracer. In this study, methodology capable of correcting for tracer differences in arterial input functions, as well as binding-independent delivery and retention, is derived and evaluated in a mouse U251 glioma xenograft model using an Affibody tracer targeted to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a cell membrane receptor overexpressed in many cancers. Simulations demonstrated that blood, and to a lesser extent vascular-permeability, pharmacokinetic differences between targeted and untargeted tracers could be quantified by deconvolving the uptakes of the two tracers in a region of interest devoid of targeted tracer binding, and therefore corrected for, by convolving the uptake of the untargeted tracer in all regions of interest by the product of the deconvolution. Using fluorescently labeled, EGFR-targeted and untargeted Affibodies (known to have different blood clearance rates), the average tumor concentration of EGFR in four mice was estimated using dual-tracer kinetic modeling to be 3.9 ± 2.4 nM compared to an expected concentration of 2.0 ± 0.4 nM. However, with deconvolution correction a more equivalent EGFR concentration of 2.0 ± 0.4 nM was measured.

Details

ISSN :
13616560 and 00319155
Volume :
59
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e2ec13e103b0ce47348c80ae53917718
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/59/10/2341