Back to Search Start Over

Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (Shingrix): Real-World Effectiveness in the First 2 Years Post-Licensure

Authors :
Heng-Ming Sung
Bradley Lufkin
Hector S. Izurieta
Jeffrey A. Kelman
Michael Wernecke
Kathleen Dooling
Yoganand Chillarige
Paula Ehrlich Agger
Yun Lu
Ruth Link-Gelles
Richard A. Forshee
Thomas MaCurdy
Xiyuan Wu
Source :
Clinical Infectious Diseases. 73:941-948
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2021.

Abstract

BackgroundShingrix (recombinant zoster vaccine) was licensed to prevent herpes zoster, dispensed as 2 doses given 2–6 months apart among adults aged ≥50 years. Clinical trials yielded efficacy of >90% for confirmed herpes zoster, but post-market performance has not been evaluated. Efficacy of a single dose and a delayed second dose and efficacy among persons with autoimmune or immunosuppressive conditions have not been studied. We aimed to assess post-market vaccine effectiveness of Shingrix.MethodsWe conducted a cohort study among Medicare Part D community-dwelling beneficiaries aged >65 years. Herpes zoster was identified using a medical office visit diagnosis with treatment, and postherpetic neuralgia was identified using a validated algorithm. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to improve cohort balance and marginal structural models to estimate hazard ratios.ResultsWe found a vaccine effectiveness of 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.6–71.5) and 56.9% (95% CI, 55.0–58.8) for 2 and 1 doses, respectively. The 2-dose vaccine effectiveness was not significantly lower for beneficiaries aged >80 years, for second doses received at ≥180 days, or for individuals with autoimmune conditions. The vaccine was also effective among individuals with immunosuppressive conditions. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness against postherpetic neuralgia was 76.0% (95% CI, 68.4–81.8).ConclusionsThis large real-world observational study of the effectiveness of Shingrix demonstrates the benefit of completing the 2-dose regimen. Second doses administered beyond the recommended 6 months did not impair effectiveness. Our effectiveness estimates were lower than the clinical trials estimates, likely due to differences in outcome specificity.

Details

ISSN :
15376591 and 10584838
Volume :
73
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e2f725afeaf8c5b6f37e547d9b6b8706
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab125